Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Low Diagnostic Yield of Elective Coronary Angiography
20101.1k citationsEric D. Peterson, David Dai et al.profile →
Clinical Outcomes at 1 Year Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
2015332 citationsDavid R. Holmes, James M. Brennan et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Brennan
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Brennan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Brennan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Brennan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Brennan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Brennan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Brennan. The network helps show where James M. Brennan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Brennan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Brennan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Brennan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Brennan. James M. Brennan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brennan, James M. & F. S. Lukoschus. (1971). Parasitic Mites of Surinam. VIII. A New Genus and Species of Chigger, Fauranius atecmartus, and Additional Records of Species (Acarnia: Trombiculidae). Occidental College Scholar (Occidental College). 70(1). 42–45.9 indexed citations
13.
Brennan, James M.. (1970). A Small Collection of Chiggers from Surinam (Acarina: Trombiculidae). Occidental College Scholar (Occidental College).6 indexed citations
14.
Brennan, James M., et al.. (1970). Revival of the Monotypic Genus Boshellia Ewing, 1950 (Acarina: Trombiculidae). Occidental College Scholar (Occidental College).
15.
Brennan, James M.. (1967). New records of Chiggers from the West Indies. The Digital Academic Repository of Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Naturalis Biodiversity Center). 24(1). 146–156.16 indexed citations
16.
Brennan, James M. & Eleanor K. Jones. (1961). Chiggers of Peru (Acarina: Trombiculidae). Acarologia. 3(2). 172–205.14 indexed citations
17.
Brennan, James M., et al.. (1960). Chiggers of Trinidad, B.W.I. (Acarina: Trombiculidae). Acarologia. 2(4). 493–540.19 indexed citations
18.
Brennan, James M.. (1960). Ectonyx, a new neotropical genus of chiggers (Acarina: Trombiculidae). Acarologia. 2(1). 88–91.2 indexed citations
19.
Brennan, James M.. (1960). Eight new species of Pseudoschongastia from Mexico and Panama with a revised key to species (Acarina: Trombiculidae). Acarologia. 2(4). 480–492.8 indexed citations
20.
Brennan, James M., et al.. (1953). A preliminary Report on the laboratory Colonization of the Mosquito, Culex tarsalis Coquillett.. Mosquito news. 13(2).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.