Michael Bint

515 total citations
10 papers, 242 citations indexed

About

Michael Bint is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Bint has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 242 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 3 papers in Infectious Diseases and 2 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Michael Bint's work include Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers). Michael Bint is often cited by papers focused on Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers). Michael Bint collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and New Zealand. Michael Bint's co-authors include Peter G. Parsons, G. A. T. Hawson, P. V. Zimmerman, Mark Patrick, John Pearn, Jennifer Broom, Henry Marshall, Kwun M. Fong, Steven Leong and Adam G. Stewart and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, BMJ Open and The Medical Journal of Australia.

In The Last Decade

Michael Bint

9 papers receiving 232 citations

Peers

Michael Bint

PRM

CR

ONCOL

SURGE

MB

Hong Jae Jo South Korea

Ana Rodrigues Portugal

Josiane Mourão Dias Brazil

Taiyuan Li China

J. Bloss United States

Yongdong Wu China

Haining Fan China

A. Saadi Tunisia

Ermina Iljazović Bosnia and Herzegovina

Mariya Amin Qurieshi India

Hong Jae Jo South Korea

Michael Bint

94 ×0.7

PRM

32 ×0.4

CR

91 ×1.3

ONCOL

122 ×2.8

SURGE

44 ×1.3

MB

Citations per year, relative to Michael Bint Michael Bint (= 1×) peers Hong Jae Jo

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bint

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bint's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bint more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bint

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bint. The network helps show where Michael Bint may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Bint

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Bint. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Bint based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Bint. Michael Bint is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Fielding, David, Andrew J. Dalley, Mahendra Singh, et al.. (2023). Whole Genome Sequencing in Advanced Lung Cancer can be Performed Using Diff-Quik Cytology Smears Derived from Endobronchial Ultrasound, Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS TBNA). Lung. 201(4). 407–413.

2.

Samaranayake, Chinthaka B., et al.. (2020). A Randomized Controlled Trial on Optimal Sampling Sequence in Radial Guide Sheath Endobronchial Ultrasound Lung Biopsy. Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology. 27(3). 205–211. 1 indexed citations

3.

Gillis, David, et al.. (2020). Granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease: limiting immunosuppressive therapy—a single‐centre experience. Respirology Case Reports. 8(5). e00565–e00565. 6 indexed citations

4.

Stewart, Adam G., et al.. (2019). Rhodococcus equi infection: A diverse spectrum of disease. IDCases. 15. e00487–e00487. 16 indexed citations

5.

Samaranayake, Chinthaka B., et al.. (2019). Respiratory acute discharge service: a hospital in the home programme for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (RADS study). Internal Medicine Journal. 50(10). 1253–1258. 7 indexed citations

6.

Fysh, Edward, Rajesh Thomas, Catherine Read, et al.. (2014). Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis. BMJ Open. 4(11). e006757–e006757. 19 indexed citations

7.

Leong, Steven, Henry Marshall, Michael Bint, et al.. (2013). Mediastinal Abscess After Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration. Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology. 20(4). 338–341. 17 indexed citations

8.

Broom, Jennifer, et al.. (2012). Coccidioidomycosis in returned Australian travellers. Internal Medicine Journal. 42(8). 940–943. 8 indexed citations

9.

Zimmerman, P. V., Michael Bint, G. A. T. Hawson, & Peter G. Parsons. (1987). PLOIDY AS A PROGNOSTIC DETERMINANT IN SURGICALLY TREATED LUNG CANCER. The Lancet. 330(8558). 530–533. 148 indexed citations

10.

Patrick, Mark, Michael Bint, & John Pearn. (1979). SALTWATER DROWNING AND NEAR‐DROWNING ACCIDENTS INVOLVING CHILDREN. The Medical Journal of Australia. 1(2). 61–64. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact