M.H. Shaevitz

2.3k citations
5 papers · 32 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Journal of Instrumentation (1 paper)Physical review. D (1 paper)Journal of Physics Conference Series (1 paper)Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements (1 paper)Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

M.H. Shaevitz

5 papers receiving 32 citations

Peers

M.H. Shaevitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 6
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 30
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 3
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 2
  • Aerospace Engineering 4
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3
Replace A. Caldwell with:
A. Caldwell Germany
A.F. Makarov Russia
L. A. Linden Levy United States
N. Abgrall United States
P. Staszel Poland
M. Slunečka Russia
S. Stroiney United States
J. Hogenbirk Netherlands
Y. Wu China
M.H. Shaevitz relative to A. Caldwell Germany A. Caldwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
A. Caldwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.H. Shaevitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.H. Shaevitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.H. Shaevitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.H. Shaevitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.H. Shaevitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.H. Shaevitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.H. Shaevitz. The network helps show where M.H. Shaevitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside M.H. Shaevitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.H. Shaevitz Line = papers co-authored together M.H. Shaevitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown

About M.H. Shaevitz

M.H. Shaevitz is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 5 papers that have together received 32 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neutrino Physics Research (5 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers), Muon and positron interactions and applications (1 paper) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (30 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (3 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (2 citations), Aerospace Engineering (4 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3 citations). M.H. Shaevitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. M. Conrad, Marjon Moulai, A. Diaz, C. Argüelles, G. H. Collin, L. Bartoszek, J. Spitz and J. Alonso. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Instrumentation, Physical review. D, Journal of Physics Conference Series, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact