M.H. Haloua

883 total citations
15 papers, 599 citations indexed

About

M.H. Haloua is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, M.H. Haloua has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 599 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cancer Research, 12 papers in Surgery and 9 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in M.H. Haloua's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (14 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (11 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers). M.H. Haloua is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (14 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (11 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers). M.H. Haloua collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Greece and United States. M.H. Haloua's co-authors include N.M.A. Krekel, Sybren Meijer, M. Petrousjka van den Tol, José H. Volders, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, D. Rietveld, Frank W. Bloemers, Henri A. H. Winters, Vera L. Negenborn and Louise M. de Widt-Levert and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Research, Annals of Surgery and The Lancet Oncology.

In The Last Decade

M.H. Haloua

14 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M.H. Haloua Netherlands	12	461	380	272	116	70	15	599
Daniela Bossi Italy	10	137 0.3×	110 0.3×	102 0.4×	56 0.5×	40 0.6×	19	303
Afonso Celso Pinto Nazário Brazil	14	114 0.2×	94 0.2×	77 0.3×	180 1.6×	54 0.8×	59	434
I. Biltjes Belgium	12	292 0.6×	130 0.3×	427 1.6×	72 0.6×	529 7.6×	24	786
Joo Heung Kim South Korea	11	123 0.3×	169 0.4×	83 0.3×	81 0.7×	33 0.5×	31	383
Renato Zocchio Torresan Brazil	9	145 0.3×	176 0.5×	101 0.4×	71 0.6×	45 0.6×	21	321
Franziska Kubatzki Italy	13	297 0.6×	180 0.5×	189 0.7×	168 1.4×	236 3.4×	18	603
Daniela Distefano Switzerland	13	45 0.1×	273 0.7×	267 1.0×	23 0.2×	153 2.2×	23	473
Jordan H. Garst United States	10	49 0.1×	183 0.5×	59 0.2×	109 0.9×	33 0.5×	14	436
A Kärkkäinen Finland	9	73 0.2×	282 0.7×	76 0.3×	116 1.0×	97 1.4×	11	551
Sanjay Warrier Australia	12	138 0.3×	207 0.5×	67 0.2×	74 0.6×	22 0.3×	46	319

Countries citing papers authored by M.H. Haloua

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.H. Haloua's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.H. Haloua with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.H. Haloua more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.H. Haloua

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.H. Haloua. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.H. Haloua. The network helps show where M.H. Haloua may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.H. Haloua

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.H. Haloua. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.H. Haloua based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.H. Haloua. M.H. Haloua is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Volders, José H., Vera L. Negenborn, M.H. Haloua, et al.. (2018). Breast‐specific factors determine cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after breast‐conserving therapy: Results from the randomized COBALT study. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 117(5). 1001–1008. 29 indexed citations

Volders, José H., et al.. (2018). [Ultrasound-guided surgery for breast cancer].. PubMed. 162. D2218–D2218. 1 indexed citations

Volders, José H., Vera L. Negenborn, M.H. Haloua, et al.. (2017). Cosmetic outcome and quality of life are inextricably linked in breast‐conserving therapy. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 115(8). 941–948. 30 indexed citations

Negenborn, Vera L., José H. Volders, N.M.A. Krekel, et al.. (2017). Breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer: Cosmetic results and options for delayed reconstruction. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 70(10). 1336–1344. 11 indexed citations

Volders, José H., M.H. Haloua, N.M.A. Krekel, et al.. (2016). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast-conserving surgery – Consequences on margin status and excision volumes. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 42(7). 986–993. 47 indexed citations

Volders, José H., M.H. Haloua, N.M.A. Krekel, et al.. (2016). Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 43(4). 649–657. 28 indexed citations

Haloua, M.H., José H. Volders, N.M.A. Krekel, et al.. (2015). A nationwide pathology study on surgical margins and excision volumes after breast-conserving surgery: There is still much to be gained. The Breast. 25. 14–21. 31 indexed citations

Haloua, M.H., José H. Volders, N.M.A. Krekel, et al.. (2015). Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance in Breast-Conserving Surgery Improves Cosmetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (COBALT). Annals of Surgical Oncology. 23(1). 30–37. 36 indexed citations

Haloua, M.H., G Jacobs, Barbara M. Zonderhuis, et al.. (2014). Cosmetic Outcome Assessment following Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Comparison between BCCT.core Software and Panel Evaluation. International Journal of Breast Cancer. 2014. 1–7. 48 indexed citations

10.

Haloua, M.H., N.M.A. Krekel, Veerle M.H. Coupé, et al.. (2013). Ultrasound-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer is cost-saving: Results of a cost-benefit analysis. The Breast. 22(3). 238–243. 23 indexed citations

11.

Haloua, M.H., N.M.A. Krekel, Henri A. H. Winters, et al.. (2013). A Systematic Review of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery. Annals of Surgery. 257(4). 609–620. 132 indexed citations

12.

Krekel, N.M.A., M.H. Haloua, Anne Marie Bosch, et al.. (2012). Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology. 14(1). 48–54. 137 indexed citations

13.

Haloua, M.H., N.M.A. Krekel, Veerle M.H. Coupé, Petrousjka van den Tol, & S. Meijer. (2012). Abstract PD04-01: Intra-operative ultrasound in breast-conserving surgery for palpable breast cancer significantly improves both surgical accuracy and cosmetic outcome while saving costs.. Cancer Research. 72(24_Supplement). PD04–1. 1 indexed citations

14.

Krekel, N.M.A., M.H. Haloua, A.M.F. Lopes Cardozo, et al.. (2012). 1LBA Intra-operative Ultrasound is Imperative to Obtain Adequate Tumour Margins and Excision Volumes in Breast-conserving Surgery for Palpable Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial. European Journal of Cancer. 48. S2–S2.

15.

Haloua, M.H., et al.. (2011). Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments: Influence of Temperature, Humidity, and Age. The Journal Of Hand Surgery. 36(7). 1191–1196. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact