M.‐F. Kuo
Impact in
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Motor Control and Adaptation
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Papers in
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 5
- Neurological disorders and treatments 1
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 1
-
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 1
- Motor Control and Adaptation 1
- Neural dynamics and brain function 1
- Co-authors
- Walter Paulus (5 shared papers)Michael A. Nitsche (4 shared papers)Giorgi Batsikadze (2 shared papers)Vera Moliadze (2 shared papers)Michael Nitsche (1 shared paper)David Liebetanz (1 shared paper)Kátia Monte‐Silva (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Neurophysiology (2 papers)Cerebral Cortex (1 paper)The Journal of Physiology (1 paper)Klinische Neurophysiologie (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
M.‐F. Kuo
5 papers receiving 968 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Neurology 883
- Cognitive Neuroscience 572
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 67
- Rehabilitation 68
- Psychiatry and Mental health 119
Countries citing papers authored by M.‐F. Kuo
This map shows the geographic impact of M.‐F. Kuo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.‐F. Kuo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.‐F. Kuo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.‐F. Kuo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.‐F. Kuo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.‐F. Kuo. The network helps show where M.‐F. Kuo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside M.‐F. Kuo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 776 |
| 2 | 2007 | 194 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 1 |
About M.‐F. Kuo
M.‐F. Kuo is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 5 papers that have together received 976 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), Motor Control and Adaptation (1 paper), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (1 paper), Vestibular and auditory disorders (1 paper) and Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (883 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (572 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (67 citations), Rehabilitation (68 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (119 citations). M.‐F. Kuo has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Walter Paulus, Michael A. Nitsche, Giorgi Batsikadze, Vera Moliadze, Michael Nitsche, David Liebetanz and Kátia Monte‐Silva. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Neurophysiology, Cerebral Cortex, The Journal of Physiology and Klinische Neurophysiologie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.