Meryem İpek

739 total citations
32 papers, 550 citations indexed

About

Meryem İpek is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Meryem İpek has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 550 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Plant Science, 8 papers in Molecular Biology and 7 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Meryem İpek's work include Garlic and Onion Studies (15 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (9 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (9 papers). Meryem İpek is often cited by papers focused on Garlic and Onion Studies (15 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (9 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (9 papers). Meryem İpek collaborates with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and Azerbaijan. Meryem İpek's co-authors include Ahmet İpek, Philipp W. Simon, Hatice Gülen, Ayşe Tülin Öz, P. Nicholson, Murat Bayraktar, Sezai Erċışlı, Atilla Eriş, Murat Akçay and Sergül Ergin and has published in prestigious journals such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Scientia Horticulturae and Genome.

In The Last Decade

Meryem İpek

28 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Meryem İpek Türkiye 14 442 157 135 98 94 32 550
V. Sarri Italy 9 295 0.7× 143 0.9× 208 1.5× 203 2.1× 40 0.4× 17 424
S. Hepaksoy Türkiye 10 323 0.7× 95 0.6× 84 0.6× 60 0.6× 40 0.4× 38 396
Tsuneo Sasanuma Japan 14 417 0.9× 156 1.0× 115 0.9× 16 0.2× 49 0.5× 25 512
R. Messina Italy 12 394 0.9× 204 1.3× 149 1.1× 109 1.1× 66 0.7× 22 517
Olfa Saddoud Debbabi Tunisia 17 540 1.2× 99 0.6× 117 0.9× 73 0.7× 137 1.5× 33 631
María de Fátima Pires da Silva Machado Brazil 12 265 0.6× 138 0.9× 73 0.5× 27 0.3× 65 0.7× 58 384
Amelia Salimonti Italy 10 212 0.5× 127 0.8× 164 1.2× 224 2.3× 21 0.2× 21 386
Hongmei Miao China 15 691 1.6× 294 1.9× 90 0.7× 17 0.2× 37 0.4× 41 830
François Luro France 10 450 1.0× 273 1.7× 53 0.4× 24 0.2× 32 0.3× 15 587
Silvia Doveri Italy 8 137 0.3× 182 1.2× 129 1.0× 127 1.3× 11 0.1× 9 302

Countries citing papers authored by Meryem İpek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meryem İpek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meryem İpek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meryem İpek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meryem İpek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meryem İpek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meryem İpek. The network helps show where Meryem İpek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meryem İpek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meryem İpek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meryem İpek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meryem İpek. Meryem İpek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
İpek, Meryem, et al.. (2022). Comparative characterization of the content and in vitro bioaccessibility of minerals in two Cornus species. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences. 35(3). 115–120. 1 indexed citations
2.
Akparov, Zeynal, et al.. (2021). Genetic variation and relationships between Azerbaijani and Turkish olive genetic resources. Molecular Biology Reports. 49(6). 5209–5217. 5 indexed citations
3.
İpek, Ahmet, et al.. (2017). Transcriptome-based SNP discovery by GBS and the construction of a genetic map for olive. Functional & Integrative Genomics. 17(5). 493–501. 16 indexed citations
4.
İpek, Ahmet, et al.. (2016). SNP Discovery by GBS in Olive and the Construction of a High-Density Genetic Linkage Map. Biochemical Genetics. 54(3). 313–325. 57 indexed citations
5.
İpek, Meryem, et al.. (2015). Identification of molecular markers associated with fruit traits in olive and assessment of olive core collection with AFLP markers and fruit traits. Genetics and Molecular Research. 14(1). 2762–2774. 22 indexed citations
6.
İpek, Meryem, et al.. (2015). Association of SSR markers with contents of fatty acids in olive oil and genetic diversity analysis of an olive core collection. Genetics and Molecular Research. 14(1). 2241–2252. 13 indexed citations
7.
İpek, Meryem, et al.. (2014). Dikim öncesi depolama sıcaklığının sarımsak (Allium sativum L.) klonlarında bitki gelişimi üzerine etkisi. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 42. 1–10. 1 indexed citations
8.
İpek, Ahmet, et al.. (2012). Assessment of inter- and intra-cultivar variations in olive using SSR markers. Scientia Agricola. 69(5). 327–335. 26 indexed citations
9.
İpek, Ahmet, Hatice Gülen, Meryem İpek, et al.. (2011). Determination of self-incompatibility groups of sweet cherry genotypes from Turkey. Genetics and Molecular Research. 10(1). 253–260. 25 indexed citations
10.
Erdoğan, V., Turgut Yeşiloğlu, A.B. Küden, et al.. (2011). Turunçgiller ve İncir Yetiştiriciliği. 1 indexed citations
11.
İpek, Ahmet, et al.. (2010). Genetic Diversity Among Some Currants (Ribes Spp.) Cultivars As Assessed BY AFLP MARKERS. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 42(2). 1009–1012. 3 indexed citations
12.
İpek, Ahmet, et al.. (2009). Genetic diversity among some blackberry cultivars and their relationship with Boysenberry assessed by AFLP markers.. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. 8(19). 4830–4834. 8 indexed citations
13.
İpek, Ahmet, et al.. (2009). SSR analysis demonstrates that olive production in the southern Marmara region in Turkey uses a single genotype. Genetics and Molecular Research. 8(4). 1264–1272. 15 indexed citations
14.
İpek, Meryem, Ahmet İpek, & Philipp W. Simon. (2008). Rapid Characterization of Garlic Clones with Locus-Specific DNA Markers. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY. 32(5). 357–362. 16 indexed citations
15.
İpek, Meryem, et al.. (2008). Screening and comparing tocopherols in the rapeseed (Brassica napusL.) and olive (Olea europaeaL.) varieties using high-performance liquid chromatography. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 59(6). 483–490. 13 indexed citations
16.
İpek, Meryem, Ahmet İpek, Douglas Senalik, & Philipp W. Simon. (2007). Characterization of an Unusual Cytoplasmic Chimera Detected in Bolting Garlic Clones. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 132(5). 664–669. 9 indexed citations
18.
İpek, Meryem, Ahmet İpek, & Philipp W. Simon. (2006). Sequence homology of polymorphic AFLP markers in garlic (Allium sativum L.). Genome. 49(10). 1246–1255. 17 indexed citations
19.
İpek, Meryem, et al.. (2004). Demonstration of linkage and development of the first low-density genetic map of garlic, based on AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 110(2). 228–236. 65 indexed citations
20.
İpek, Meryem, Ahmet İpek, & Philipp W. Simon. (2003). Comparison of AFLPs, RAPD Markers, and Isozymes for Diversity Assessment of Garlic and Detection of Putative Duplicates in Germplasm Collections. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 128(2). 246–252.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026