Merete Studnitz

638 total citations
19 papers, 489 citations indexed

About

Merete Studnitz is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Merete Studnitz has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 489 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Small Animals, 11 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 3 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in Merete Studnitz's work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (14 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (10 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). Merete Studnitz is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (14 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (10 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). Merete Studnitz collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, France and Spain. Merete Studnitz's co-authors include Lene Juul Pedersen, Margit Bak Jensen, Erik Jørgensen, Karin Hjelholt Jensen, K.H. Jensen, Jan Værum Nørgaard, Lene Stødkilde, Ulrich Halekoh, Anne Grete Kongsted and Jørgen Eriksen and has published in prestigious journals such as Sustainability, Applied Animal Behaviour Science and Preventive Veterinary Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Merete Studnitz

16 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Merete Studnitz Denmark 9 398 325 101 81 60 19 489
Anne Grete Kongsted Denmark 14 292 0.7× 248 0.8× 85 0.8× 128 1.6× 144 2.4× 44 470
A. H. Stewart United Kingdom 10 163 0.4× 336 1.0× 104 1.0× 85 1.0× 45 0.8× 27 506
K.C. Horvath United States 11 249 0.6× 253 0.8× 155 1.5× 43 0.5× 133 2.2× 19 432
Monique Bestman Netherlands 14 452 1.1× 634 2.0× 50 0.5× 107 1.3× 30 0.5× 25 790
Annaïs Carbajal Spain 13 213 0.5× 188 0.6× 54 0.5× 175 2.2× 52 0.9× 39 494
S. Borragán Spain 13 209 0.5× 91 0.3× 114 1.1× 154 1.9× 78 1.3× 35 636
MBM Bracke Netherlands 8 263 0.7× 156 0.5× 110 1.1× 96 1.2× 34 0.6× 9 352
J.C. Pollard New Zealand 14 278 0.7× 198 0.6× 185 1.8× 165 2.0× 107 1.8× 33 488
T. Tennessen Canada 11 362 0.9× 342 1.1× 141 1.4× 50 0.6× 77 1.3× 17 498
Beth Ventura United States 12 531 1.3× 307 0.9× 213 2.1× 127 1.6× 106 1.8× 30 718

Countries citing papers authored by Merete Studnitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Merete Studnitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merete Studnitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merete Studnitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Merete Studnitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merete Studnitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merete Studnitz. The network helps show where Merete Studnitz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Merete Studnitz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Merete Studnitz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Merete Studnitz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Merete Studnitz. Merete Studnitz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Vaarst, Mette, Merete Studnitz, Mogens Agerbo Krogh, & Hanne Kongsted. (2025). Living labs opened dialogues about antibiotic use in dairy cattle and pig sectors - Insights from a Danish case study based on participatory action research. Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. 67(1). 33–33.
2.
Molia, Sophie, Erwin Wauters, Stefaan Ribbens, et al.. (2024). How Contexts and Desired Impacts Shape Interventions towards Improved Antimicrobial Use in Animal Production. EuroChoices. 23(2). 44–51.
3.
Studnitz, Merete, et al.. (2023). Interventions to change antimicrobial use in livestock: A scoping review and an impact pathway analysis of what works, how, for whom and why. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 220. 106025–106025. 7 indexed citations
5.
Díaz-Gaona, Cipriano, Anne Grete Kongsted, Jan Værum Nørgaard, et al.. (2019). Feeding monogastrics 100% organic and regionally produced feed. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 4 indexed citations
6.
Jensen, Margit Bak, Merete Studnitz, & Lene Juul Pedersen. (2010). The effect of type of rooting material and space allowance on exploration and abnormal behaviour in growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 123(3-4). 87–92. 49 indexed citations
7.
Damgaard, Birthe Marie, Merete Studnitz, & K.H. Jensen. (2008). The effect of continuous grouping of pigs in large groups on stress response and haematological parameters. Livestock Science. 121(1). 137–140. 6 indexed citations
8.
Halekoh, Ulrich, Erik Jørgensen, Margit Bak Jensen, et al.. (2007). Ranking of Simultaneously Presented Choice Options in Animal Preference Experiments. Biometrical Journal. 49(4). 599–612. 1 indexed citations
9.
Jensen, Margit Bak, Merete Studnitz, Ulrich Halekoh, Lene Juul Pedersen, & Erik Jørgensen. (2007). Pigs’ preferences for rooting materials measured in a three-choice maze-test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 112(3-4). 270–283. 27 indexed citations
10.
Studnitz, Merete, Margit Bak Jensen, & Lene Juul Pedersen. (2006). Why do pigs root and in what will they root?. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 107(3-4). 183–197. 263 indexed citations
11.
12.
Damgaard, Birthe Marie, Merete Studnitz, Jens Peter Nielsen, et al.. (2006). The effects of zonation of the pen and grouping in intact litters on use of pen, immune competence and health of pigs. Livestock Science. 104(1-2). 203–216. 1 indexed citations
13.
Studnitz, Merete, et al.. (2003). Does nose ringing make any sense. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 1 indexed citations
14.
Studnitz, Merete, et al.. (2003). The Effect of Nose Ringing on Exploratory Behaviour in Gilts. Animal Welfare. 12(1). 109–118. 11 indexed citations
15.
Studnitz, Merete, Karin Hjelholt Jensen, & Erik Jørgensen. (2003). The effect of nose rings on the exploratory behaviour of outdoor gilts exposed to different tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 84(1). 41–57. 19 indexed citations
16.
Studnitz, Merete & Karin Hjelholt Jensen. (2002). Expression of rooting motivation in gilts following different lengths of deprivation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 76(3). 203–213. 15 indexed citations
17.
Studnitz, Merete. (2001). Tryneringnings betydning for udegående poltes adfærd og velfærd. 1 indexed citations
18.
Herskin, Mette S., Karin Hjelholt Jensen, & Merete Studnitz. (1998). Influence of timidity and social environment during lactation on maternal reactivity of outdoor sows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science. 48(4). 230–236. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pedersen, Lene Juul, et al.. (1998). Suckling behaviour of piglets in relation to accessibility to the sow and the presence of foreign litters. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 58(3-4). 267–279. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026