Merete Lie
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Gender and Technology in Education
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 8
-
- Socioeconomic Development in Asia 2
- Asian Studies and History 2
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy 2
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 2
- Co-authors
- Knut H. Sørensen (1 shared paper)Wendy Faulkner (1 shared paper)Nelly Oudshoorn (1 shared paper)Ann Rudinow Sætnan (1 shared paper)Ragnhild Lund (5 shared papers)Mikael Ohlson (1 shared paper)Håvard Kauserud (1 shared paper)Øyvind Stensrud (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Merete Lie
29 papers receiving 609 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Human-Computer Interaction 98
- Gender Studies 143
- Museology 42
- Communication 59
- Reproductive Medicine 71
Countries citing papers authored by Merete Lie
This map shows the geographic impact of Merete Lie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merete Lie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merete Lie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Merete Lie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merete Lie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merete Lie. The network helps show where Merete Lie may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Merete Lie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Making Technology Our Own?: Domesticating Technology Into Everyday Life | 1996 | 296 |
| 2 | 1995 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 57 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 18 | Office work and skills | 1985 | 5 |
| 19 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 4 |
About Merete Lie
Merete Lie is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Public Administration, having authored 34 papers that have together received 771 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (8 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers), Asian Studies and History (2 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (2 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (2 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (98 citations), Gender Studies (143 citations), Museology (42 citations), Communication (59 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (71 citations). Merete Lie has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Knut H. Sørensen, Wendy Faulkner, Nelly Oudshoorn, Ann Rudinow Sætnan, Ragnhild Lund, Mikael Ohlson, Håvard Kauserud, Øyvind Stensrud, Judith Nagata and Katie Winkle. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Women s Studies, Gender Technology and Development, Science as Culture, Economic and Industrial Democracy and AI & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.