Meredith A. Stone

421 total citations
9 papers, 74 citations indexed

About

Meredith A. Stone is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Meredith A. Stone has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 74 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1 paper in Instrumentation and 1 paper in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Meredith A. Stone's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (6 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers). Meredith A. Stone is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (6 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers). Meredith A. Stone collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Meredith A. Stone's co-authors include G. H. Rieke, Jianwei Lyu, Stacey Alberts, Kevin Hainline, Yongda Zhu, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Nina Bonaventura, Pablo G. Pérez‐González, Christina C. Williams and Pierluigi Rinaldi and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

In The Last Decade

Meredith A. Stone

6 papers receiving 41 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Meredith A. Stone United States 5 65 21 15 4 3 9 74
Satoshi Kikuta Japan 5 58 0.9× 26 1.2× 15 1.0× 3 0.8× 3 1.0× 13 59
N. K. Hine United Kingdom 4 64 1.0× 27 1.3× 16 1.1× 3 0.8× 2 0.7× 4 64
Daniel Masters United States 2 67 1.0× 27 1.3× 15 1.0× 4 1.0× 4 1.3× 3 68
Charlotte Simmonds United Kingdom 8 112 1.7× 33 1.6× 11 0.7× 4 1.0× 3 1.0× 15 128
K. Napier United States 5 54 0.8× 18 0.9× 9 0.6× 4 1.0× 2 0.7× 8 57
M. Symeonidis United Kingdom 5 83 1.3× 24 1.1× 9 0.6× 3 0.8× 2 0.7× 5 84
J. E. Gonzalez United States 2 66 1.0× 36 1.7× 12 0.8× 4 1.0× 2 0.7× 3 67
S Bhargava United Kingdom 4 49 0.8× 23 1.1× 14 0.9× 4 1.0× 1 0.3× 5 58
H. Dole France 2 42 0.6× 20 1.0× 14 0.9× 5 1.3× 3 1.0× 2 48
Patrick Drew United States 4 89 1.4× 45 2.1× 10 0.7× 4 1.0× 2 0.7× 5 92

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith A. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith A. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith A. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith A. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith A. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith A. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith A. Stone. The network helps show where Meredith A. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meredith A. Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meredith A. Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meredith A. Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meredith A. Stone. Meredith A. Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Lyu, Jianwei, G. H. Rieke, Meredith A. Stone, et al.. (2025). Fading Light, Fierce Winds: JWST Snapshot of a Sub-Eddington Quasar at Cosmic Dawn. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 981(1). L20–L20. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rieke, G. H., Yang Sun, Jianwei Lyu, et al.. (2025). Confirming Near- to Mid-infrared Photometrically Identified Obscured AGNs in the JWST Era. The Astrophysical Journal. 994(1). 35–35. 1 indexed citations
3.
Sun, Yang, G. H. Rieke, Jianwei Lyu, et al.. (2025). Evolution of the M M BH Relation from z ∼ 6 to the Present Epoch. The Astrophysical Journal. 983(2). 165–165. 4 indexed citations
4.
Stone, Meredith A., G. H. Rieke, Jianwei Lyu, et al.. (2025). The z = 7.08 Quasar ULAS J1120+0641 May Never Reach a “Normal” Black Hole to Stellar Mass Ratio. The Astrophysical Journal. 993(2). 168–168.
5.
Stone, Meredith A., Stacey Alberts, G. H. Rieke, et al.. (2024). 5–25 μm Galaxy Number Counts from Deep JWST Data. The Astrophysical Journal. 972(1). 62–62. 5 indexed citations
6.
Rieke, G. H., A. Alonso‐Herrero, A. Paggi, et al.. (2024). Search for High-excitation Emission Lines from a Quasar-scale Active Nucleus in Arp 220. The Astrophysical Journal. 977(1). 55–55.
7.
Alberts, Stacey, Jianwei Lyu, Irene Shivaei, et al.. (2024). SMILES Initial Data Release: Unveiling the Obscured Universe with MIRI Multiband Imaging. The Astrophysical Journal. 976(2). 224–224. 10 indexed citations
8.
Stone, Meredith A., Jianwei Lyu, G. H. Rieke, Stacey Alberts, & Kevin Hainline. (2024). Undermassive Host Galaxies of Five z ∼ 6 Luminous Quasars Detected with JWST. The Astrophysical Journal. 964(1). 90–90. 36 indexed citations
9.
Stone, Meredith A., Jianwei Lyu, G. H. Rieke, & Stacey Alberts. (2023). Detection of the Low-stellar-mass Host Galaxy of a z ∼ 6.25 Quasar with JWST. The Astrophysical Journal. 953(2). 180–180. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026