K. Napier

26.8k total citations
8 papers, 57 citations indexed

About

K. Napier is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Napier has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 57 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Instrumentation and 2 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in K. Napier's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (3 papers). K. Napier is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (3 papers). K. Napier collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. K. Napier's co-authors include Guillaume Mahler, Michael D. Gladders, Keren Sharon, Matthew Bayliss, Håkon Dahle, Jane R. Rigby, Michael Florian, T. Emil Rivera-Thorsen, Keunho Kim and Ramesh Mainali and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

In The Last Decade

K. Napier

8 papers receiving 46 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
K. Napier United States	5	54	18	9	4	2	8	57
Chien-Cheng Lin United States	5	41 0.8×	16 0.9×	6 0.7×	3 0.8×		11	45
Satoshi Kikuta Japan	5	58 1.1×	26 1.4×	15 1.7×	3 0.8×		13	59
Christoph Deil Germany	4	37 0.7×	10 0.6×	8 0.9×	3 0.8×		15	42
J. B. Haislip United States	4	49 0.9×	22 1.2×	6 0.7×	3 0.8×		18	51
Rashmi Gottumukkala Denmark	4	73 1.4×	36 2.0×	8 0.9×	3 0.8×		6	73
W. Cerny United States	5	50 0.9×	23 1.3×	9 1.0×	3 0.8×		8	53
Humna Awan United States	3	43 0.8×	15 0.8×	7 0.8×	5 1.3×		5	45
L. Zalesky United States	4	38 0.7×	12 0.7×	6 0.7×	3 0.8×		4	41
Mariana S. Lazarova United States	3	59 1.1×	17 0.9×	13 1.4×	2 0.5×		5	62
A Bermeo United States	2	43 0.8×	20 1.1×	13 1.4×	3 0.8×		2	52

Countries citing papers authored by K. Napier

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Napier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Napier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Napier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Napier

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Napier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Napier. The network helps show where K. Napier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Napier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Napier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Napier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Napier. K. Napier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Kim, Keunho, Matthew Bayliss, Jane R. Rigby, et al.. (2023). Small Region, Big Impact: Highly Anisotropic Lyman-continuum Escape from a Compact Starburst Region with Extreme Physical Properties. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 955(1). L17–L17. 17 indexed citations

2.

Napier, K., Kaiya Merz, Gourav Khullar, et al.. (2023). COOL–LAMPS. III. Discovery of a 25.″9 Separation Quasar Lensed by a Merging Galaxy Cluster* . The Astrophysical Journal. 946(2). 63–63. 4 indexed citations

3.

Napier, K., Keren Sharon, Håkon Dahle, et al.. (2023). Hubble Constant Measurement from Three Large-separation Quasars Strongly Lensed by Galaxy Clusters. The Astrophysical Journal. 959(2). 134–134. 8 indexed citations

4.

Khullar, Gourav, Michael D. Gladders, Keren Sharon, et al.. (2022). COOL-LAMPS. II. Characterizing the Size and Star Formation History of a Bright Strongly Lensed Early-type Galaxy at Redshift 1.02. The Astrophysical Journal. 940(1). 42–42. 2 indexed citations

5.

Sharon, Keren, Guillaume Mahler, T. Emil Rivera-Thorsen, et al.. (2022). The Cosmic Telescope That Lenses the Sunburst Arc, PSZ1 G311.65–18.48: Strong Gravitational Lensing Model and Source Plane Analysis*. The Astrophysical Journal. 941(2). 203–203. 16 indexed citations

6.

Sharon, Keren, Guillaume Mahler, K. Napier, et al.. (2021). Core Mass Estimates in Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters: A Comparison between Masses Obtained from Detailed Lens Models, Single-halo Lens Models, and Einstein Radii. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 4 indexed citations

7.

Napier, K., Adi Foord, Elena Gallo, et al.. (2020). Extended X-ray emission from the z = 4.26 radio galaxy 4C 63.20. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 498(2). 1550–1559. 5 indexed citations

8.

Evavold, Charles L., Francis C. Fekel, Matthew W. Muterspaugh, et al.. (2016). Orbital Solutions and Absolute Elements of the Massive Algol Binary ET Tauri. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 128(970). 124202–124202. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact