Mercer Rang

3.8k total citations
59 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Mercer Rang is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Mercer Rang has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Surgery, 20 papers in Epidemiology and 15 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Mercer Rang's work include Bone fractures and treatments (19 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (13 papers) and Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (11 papers). Mercer Rang is often cited by papers focused on Bone fractures and treatments (19 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (13 papers) and Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (11 papers). Mercer Rang collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Mercer Rang's co-authors include Horacio Astudillo‐de la Vega, Jan Koreska, Andrew Wainwright, Joshua E. Hyman, Benjamin A. Alman, Unni Narayanan, Catherine Steele, Darcy Fehlings, R P Jakob and John V. Fowles and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, PEDIATRICS and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Mercer Rang

57 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Mercer Rang
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Surgery 1.8k
  • Epidemiology 907
  • Rehabilitation 691
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 645
  • Neurology 505
Replace Vernon T. Tolo with:
Vernon T. Tolo United States
Douglas E. Garland United States
James F. Mooney United States
William L. Oppenheim United States
Unni Narayanan Canada
George T. Rab United States
John H. Wedge Canada
Daniel R. Cooperman United States
David P. Roye United States
Alvin H. Crawford United States
Vernon T. Tolo United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mercer Rang
Mercer Rang · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mercer Rang
Mercer Rang · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mercer Rang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mercer Rang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mercer Rang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mercer Rang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mercer Rang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mercer Rang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mercer Rang. The network helps show where Mercer Rang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mercer Rang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mercer Rang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mercer Rang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mercer Rang. Mercer Rang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 161
2 55
3 182
4
The Story of Orthopaedics
13
5 24
6 51
7 10
8 1
9
Third world orthopaedics.
7
10 10
11 12
12 11
13
The myth of muscle balance: a study of relative strengths and excursions of normal muscles about the foot and ankle
2
14 28
15 10
16 62
17 7
18 231
19
The Ulysses syndrome.
70
20 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026