Melita Steiner
- Neurology top 1%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Genetics top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Ladislau SteinerDheerendra PrasadChrister LindquistJohn R. AdlerJames C. TornerWayne M. AlvesJason P. SheehanMatei Stroila
- Topics
- Meningioma and schwannoma management (10 papers)Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers)Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers)
- Cited by
- NeurologyGeneticsEpidemiology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of neurosurgeryBritish Journal of Radiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenHungary
In The Last Decade
Melita Steiner
22 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Neurology 816
- Epidemiology 673
- Genetics 362
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 304
- Surgery 146
Countries citing papers authored by Melita Steiner
This map shows the geographic impact of Melita Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melita Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melita Steiner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melita Steiner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melita Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melita Steiner. The network helps show where Melita Steiner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melita Steiner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melita Steiner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melita Steiner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melita Steiner. Melita Steiner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 43 | |
| 4 | 101 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 69 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 176 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 44 | |
| 16 | 471 | |
| 17 | 48 | |
| 18 | An extractable nuclear antigen not attaching to tannic acid-treated erythrocytes. | 5 |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Melita Steiner
Melita Steiner is a scholar working on Genetics, Neurology and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meningioma and schwannoma management (10 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (816 citations), Genetics (362 citations) and Epidemiology (673 citations). Melita Steiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Ladislau Steiner, Dheerendra Prasad, Christer Lindquist, John R. Adler, James C. Torner, Wayne M. Alves, Jason P. Sheehan, Matei Stroila, Hung-Chuan Pan and Chun Po Yen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of neurosurgery and British Journal of Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.