Melissa Rich
- Oncology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Kathleen N LohrMichael PignoneAlfred O. BergSteven M. TeutschJames M. ScheimanMark A. SternJeffrey L. BarnettGrace H. Elta
- Topics
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers)Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (3 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Melissa Rich
8 papers receiving 660 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Oncology 549
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 300
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 211
- Surgery 163
- General Health Professions 52
Countries citing papers authored by Melissa Rich
This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa Rich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa Rich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa Rich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa Rich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa Rich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa Rich. The network helps show where Melissa Rich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melissa Rich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melissa Rich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melissa Rich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melissa Rich. Melissa Rich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults at Average Risk: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Forcebreakdown → | 598 |
| 3 | Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults | 15 |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | An analysis of factors associated with non-compliance with follow-up recommendations after a positive fecal occult blood test. | 2 |
About Melissa Rich
Melissa Rich is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 689 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (549 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (211 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (300 citations). Melissa Rich has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen N Lohr, Michael Pignone, Alfred O. Berg, Steven M. Teutsch, James M. Scheiman, Mark A. Stern, Jeffrey L. Barnett, Grace H. Elta, William D. Chey and A. Mark Fendrick. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and The American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.