Melbourne J. Schriver

772 citations
34 papers · 551 indexed · h-index 14

Melbourne J. Schriver

32 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Melbourne J. Schriver
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 263
  • Inorganic Chemistry 196
  • Organic Chemistry 308
  • Pharmaceutical Science 59
  • Biophysics 44
Replace A. N. Chekhlov with:
A. N. Chekhlov Russia
Hatsue Tamura Japan
Grigorii G. Alexandrov Russia
Bert Lutz Netherlands
Ian Lavender United Kingdom
H. A. Kuska United States
BF Hoskins
Shigeo Yoneda Japan
Andrew Hudson United Kingdom
W. MARINGGELE Germany
Melbourne J. Schriver relative to A. N. Chekhlov Russia A. N. Chekhlov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
A. N. Chekhlov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melbourne J. Schriver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melbourne J. Schriver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melbourne J. Schriver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melbourne J. Schriver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melbourne J. Schriver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melbourne J. Schriver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melbourne J. Schriver. The network helps show where Melbourne J. Schriver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melbourne J. Schriver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melbourne J. Schriver Line = papers co-authored together Melbourne J. Schriver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20172
3 20171
4 20161
5 20137
6 200233
7 19966
8 19967
9 19951
10 19946
11 199431
12 199141
13 19919
14 19910
15 199010
16 198845
17 19872
18 198612
19 19855
20 198530

About Melbourne J. Schriver

Melbourne J. Schriver is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 34 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (7 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (6 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (5 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (5 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (5 papers), Structural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds (5 papers) and Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (263 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (196 citations) and Organic Chemistry (308 citations). Melbourne J. Schriver has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jack Passmore, Neil Burford, L. H. Sutcliffe, W. V. F. Brooks, Peter S. White, Simon Parsons, Xiaoping Sun, Simon A. Parsons, Hong‐Bin Du and Arthur J. Banister. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Communications and Inorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026