Melanie Kazlas

555 citations
22 papers · 372 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers)

In The Last Decade

Melanie Kazlas

22 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

Melanie Kazlas
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Ophthalmology 181
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 152
  • Surgery 132
  • Epidemiology 97
  • Neurology 83
Replace Geoffrey C. Lam with:
Geoffrey C. Lam Australia
B. Michele Melia United States
Robert M. Feibel United States
Eric A. Steele United States
Marie Louise Roed Rasmussen Denmark
Helen Lew South Korea
Erol Coşkun Türkiye
Matthew S. Pihlblad United States
Sarah Jacobs United States
Seyhan B. Özkan Türkiye
Melanie Kazlas relative to Geoffrey C. Lam Australia Geoffrey C. Lam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Geoffrey C. Lam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Kazlas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Kazlas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Kazlas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Kazlas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Kazlas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Kazlas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Kazlas. The network helps show where Melanie Kazlas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melanie Kazlas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melanie Kazlas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melanie Kazlas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melanie Kazlas. Melanie Kazlas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 6
3 2
4 13
5 9
6 14
7 26
8 14
9
What can we learn about strabismus from a 90 second gaze recording?: Rapid evaluation of oculomotor deficits in strabismus
1
10 45
11 1
12 51
13 8
14
Monocular and Binocular Contrast Sensitivity Functions as Clinical Outcomes in Amblyopia
2
15
Rapid assessment of core visual deficits in amblyopia
1
16 1
17 16
18 4
19 5
20 121

About Melanie Kazlas

Melanie Kazlas is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (181 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (152 citations) and Neurology (83 citations). Melanie Kazlas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard D. Lisman, Brian S. Biesman, Albert Hornblass, David G. Hunter, Zhong‐Lin Lu, Alexandra Miller, Peter J. Bex, MiYoung Kwon, Iason S. Mantagos and Ankoor S. Shah. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026