Megan Bonisch
About
In The Last Decade
Megan Bonisch
5 papers receiving 179 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 150
- Psychiatry and Mental health 131
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 45
- Emergency Medicine 20
- Clinical Psychology 15
Countries citing papers authored by Megan Bonisch
This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Bonisch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Bonisch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Bonisch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Bonisch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Bonisch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Bonisch. The network helps show where Megan Bonisch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan Bonisch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan Bonisch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan Bonisch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan Bonisch. Megan Bonisch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 140 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 15 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.