Hugh Williams

832 total citations
23 papers, 287 citations indexed

About

Hugh Williams is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Hugh Williams has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 287 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Epidemiology, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Hugh Williams's work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers). Hugh Williams is often cited by papers focused on Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers). Hugh Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Hugh Williams's co-authors include Tom Carnwath, Anthea Martin, Teodora Groshkova, Soraya Mayet, Vikki Charles, Nicola Metrebian, John Strang, Deborah Zador, Nicholas Lintzeris and Laura Potts and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Addiction.

In The Last Decade

Hugh Williams

21 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Hugh Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Epidemiology 182
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 147
  • Toxicology 44
  • Hepatology 41
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 40
Replace G.H.A. van Brussel with:
G.H.A. van Brussel Netherlands
Patrick Gschwend Switzerland
Richard Littlewood United Kingdom
Elise Bailey United States
James Fetherston Australia
Elizabeth Khuri United States
Ann Nugent United States
Suzi Lyons Ireland
Fatemeh Chalabianloo Norway
Jörg Gölz Germany
G.H.A. van Brussel Netherlands View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Hugh Williams
Hugh Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Hugh Williams
Hugh Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Williams. The network helps show where Hugh Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh Williams. Hugh Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 19
3 16
4 0
5 9
6 24
7 8
8 0
9 144
10 1
11 1
12 1
13 4
14 2
15 2
16 3
17
Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB): a new drug of misuse.
17
18 4
19 13
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026