Meg Sherval

445 total citations
20 papers, 286 citations indexed

About

Meg Sherval is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Building and Construction and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Meg Sherval has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 286 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 7 papers in Building and Construction and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Meg Sherval's work include Rural development and sustainability (9 papers), Mining and Resource Management (7 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers). Meg Sherval is often cited by papers focused on Rural development and sustainability (9 papers), Mining and Resource Management (7 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers). Meg Sherval collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Meg Sherval's co-authors include Louise Askew, Nicole Graham, Paul Hodge, Jason Prior, Robyn Bartel, Stewart Williams, Daniel Robinson, Sue Jackson, Julia Coffey and Steven Threadgold and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Rural Studies, Sociologia Ruralis and Area.

In The Last Decade

Meg Sherval

19 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Meg Sherval Australia	11	133	100	73	42	38	20	286
Eve Z. Bratman United States	9	196 1.5×	38 0.4×	99 1.4×	25 0.6×	22 0.6×	14	338
Penelope Anthias United Kingdom	8	94 0.7×	85 0.8×	65 0.9×	25 0.6×	89 2.3×	15	309
Bibiana Duarte-Abadía Netherlands	12	167 1.3×	54 0.5×	55 0.8×	51 1.2×	30 0.8×	20	433
Andrew Curley United States	12	159 1.2×	55 0.6×	34 0.5×	76 1.8×	23 0.6×	20	394
Nicole Graham Australia	11	92 0.7×	32 0.3×	62 0.8×	75 1.8×	25 0.7×	25	312
Ed Wensing Australia	8	99 0.7×	42 0.4×	56 0.8×	49 1.2×	17 0.4×	21	308
Luke W. Cole United States	6	329 2.5×	61 0.6×	33 0.5×	50 1.2×	9 0.2×	11	431
Tyler McCreary United States	10	212 1.6×	95 0.9×	37 0.5×	54 1.3×	12 0.3×	41	380
Elisabet Dueholm Rasch Netherlands	8	173 1.3×	62 0.6×	70 1.0×	10 0.2×	20 0.5×	28	261
Michael Simpson United Kingdom	13	156 1.2×	40 0.4×	83 1.1×	70 1.7×	25 0.7×	46	519

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Sherval

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Sherval's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Sherval with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Sherval more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Sherval

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Sherval. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Sherval. The network helps show where Meg Sherval may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meg Sherval

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meg Sherval. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meg Sherval based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meg Sherval. Meg Sherval is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sherval, Meg, et al.. (2023). The emotional geographies of a coal mining transition: a case study of Singleton, New South Wales, Australia. Australian Geographer. 55(1). 1–21. 1 indexed citations

Sherval, Meg. (2022). Community resistance and the role of justice in shale gas development in the United Kingdom. Geographical Research. 61(2). 222–233. 6 indexed citations

Sherval, Meg. (2019). Stewart Williams—1964–2019. Australian Geographer. 50(3). 413–414.

Threadgold, Steven, et al.. (2018). Affect, risk and local politics of knowledge: changing land use in Narrabri, NSW. Environmental Sociology. 4(4). 393–404. 11 indexed citations

Farrugia, David, Joanne Hanley, Meg Sherval, et al.. (2018). The local politics of rural land use: Place, extraction industries and narratives of contemporary rurality. Journal of sociology. 55(2). 306–322. 10 indexed citations

Sherval, Meg, et al.. (2017). Farmers as modern-day stewards and the rise of new rural citizenship in the battle over land use. Local Environment. 23(1). 100–116. 12 indexed citations

Coffey, Julia, et al.. (2017). ‘If You Lose Your Youth, You Lose Your Heart and Your Future’: Affective Figures of Youth in Community Tensions Surrounding a Proposed Coal Seam Gas Project. Sociologia Ruralis. 58(3). 665–683. 8 indexed citations

Sherval, Meg, et al.. (2016). Value, Identity and Place: unearthing the emotional geographies of the extractive sector. Australian Geographer. 48(2). 153–168. 27 indexed citations

Sherval, Meg. (2015). Canada's oil sands: The mark of a new ‘oil age’ or a potential threat to Arctic security?. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2(2). 225–236. 7 indexed citations

10.

Sherval, Meg, et al.. (2015). Exploring the minescape: engaging with the complexity of the extractive sector. Area. 48(2). 176–182. 37 indexed citations

11.

Askew, Louise, Meg Sherval, & Pauline Mc̱Guirk. (2014). 'Not just drought.' Drought, rural change and more: perspectives from rural farming communities. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 235. 3 indexed citations

12.

Sherval, Meg, et al.. (2014). Competing Perceptions of the Rural Idyll: responses to threats from coal seam gas development in Gloucester, NSW, Australia. Australian Geographer. 45(2). 185–203. 28 indexed citations

13.

Sherval, Meg & Nicole Graham. (2013). Missing the Connection: How SRLU Policy Fragments Landscapes and Communities in NSW. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia). 1 indexed citations

14.

Bartel, Robyn, Nicole Graham, Sue Jackson, et al.. (2013). Legal Geography: An Australian Perspective. Geographical Research. 51(4). 339–353. 58 indexed citations

15.

Sherval, Meg & Nicole Graham. (2013). Missing the Connection. Alternative Law Journal. 38(3). 176–180. 10 indexed citations

16.

Sherval, Meg, et al.. (2012). ‘Drought-proofing’ Regional Australia and the Rhetoric Surrounding Tillegra Dam, NSW. Australian Geographer. 43(3). 253–271. 4 indexed citations

17.

Askew, Louise & Meg Sherval. (2012). Short‐Term Emergency or Recurring Climatic Extreme: A Rural Town Perspective on Drought Policy and Programs. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 71(3). 290–302. 7 indexed citations

18.

Sherval, Meg & Louise Askew. (2011). Experiencing ‘drought and more’: local responses from rural Victoria, Australia. Population and Environment. 33(4). 347–364. 27 indexed citations

19.

Kiem, Anthony S., Louise Askew, Meg Sherval, et al.. (2010). Drought and the future of rural communities: drought impacts and adaptation in regional Victoria, Australia. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 12 indexed citations

20.

Sherval, Meg. (2009). Native Alaskan engagement with social constructions of rurality. Journal of Rural Studies. 25(4). 425–434. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact