Meei‐Ling Tsaur

534 citations
19 papers · 431 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Meei‐Ling Tsaur

18 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Meei‐Ling Tsaur
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 215
  • Physiology 265
  • Sensory Systems 22
  • Pharmacology 34
  • Neurology 29
Replace Shuqin Zong with:
Shuqin Zong Japan
Lindsey A. Chew United States
S D Collins United Kingdom
Tayler D. Sheahan United States
R. Kolhekar United States
Saïd M’Dahoma Canada
K Lee United Kingdom
Karine Thibault France
Samantha M. South Australia
Kuniko Ishikawa United States
Meei‐Ling Tsaur relative to Shuqin Zong Japan Shuqin Zong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Shuqin Zong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meei‐Ling Tsaur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meei‐Ling Tsaur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meei‐Ling Tsaur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meei‐Ling Tsaur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meei‐Ling Tsaur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meei‐Ling Tsaur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meei‐Ling Tsaur. The network helps show where Meei‐Ling Tsaur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Meei‐Ling Tsaur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meei‐Ling Tsaur Line = papers co-authored together Meei‐Ling Tsaur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201471
2 199751
3 200551
4 200750
5 200335
6 201528
7 201727
8 201123
9 201521
10 201520
11 201715
12 201212
13 201411
14 20077
15 20065
16 20232
17 20221
18 20221
19 20090

About Meei‐Ling Tsaur

Meei‐Ling Tsaur is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (13 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (215 citations), Physiology (265 citations), Sensory Systems (22 citations), Pharmacology (34 citations) and Neurology (29 citations). Meei‐Ling Tsaur has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jen‐Kun Cheng, Yang‐Hsin Shih, Hsin‐Yi Huang, Cheng‐Chang Lien, Hung‐Li Wang, Dachen Chu, Pei‐Hsuan Chen, Timothy Hsu, Chia‐Shiang Lin and Yang Pan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, European Journal of Neuroscience, Pain, Journal of Neuroscience and Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact