M.-C. Lévy

25 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers

M.-C. Lévy
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Pharmaceutical Science 140
  • Molecular Medicine 83
  • Biomaterials 126
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 45
  • Hepatology 53
Replace J. Kreuter with:
J. Kreuter Germany
Pei Kan Taiwan
Emad Eldin Hassan Egypt
M. Carme Coll Ferrer United States
Richard A Graves United States
Hiroyuki Yoshino Japan
Huizhu Zhang China
Qixiong Zhang China
Satish Shilpi India
Junjian Li China
M.-C. Lévy relative to J. Kreuter Germany J. Kreuter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×22.5×
J. Kreuter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.-C. Lévy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.-C. Lévy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.-C. Lévy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.-C. Lévy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.-C. Lévy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.-C. Lévy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.-C. Lévy. The network helps show where M.-C. Lévy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.-C. Lévy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.-C. Lévy Line = papers co-authored together M.-C. Lévy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199792
2 199951
3 199648
4 200445
5 199343
6 200038
7 200236
8 199031
9 198228
10 200322
11 199922
12 198620
13 198220
14 199619
15 199118
16 199117
17 199812
18 199512
19 199410
20 19944

About M.-C. Lévy

M.-C. Lévy is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Pharmaceutical Science and Surgery, having authored 25 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood properties and coagulation (8 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (6 papers), Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (3 papers) and Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (140 citations), Molecular Medicine (83 citations), Biomaterials (126 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (45 citations) and Hepatology (53 citations). M.-C. Lévy has collaborated with scholars based in France, New Zealand and British Virgin Islands. Frequent co-authors include Florence Edwards‐Lévy, M.-C. Andry, D. Laurent‐Maquin, Michel Manfait, Bruno Clément, Yves Lebreton, Mireille Desille, B. Frémond, Yannick Mallédant and Jean‐Pierre Campion. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Journal of Microencapsulation, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and Biomaterials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact