Mayde Rosen
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kitty S. ChanRita Mangione‐SmithEmmett B. KeelerJill A. MarstellerStephen M. ShortellMarjorie L. PearsonPeter MendelMatthias Schonlau
- Topics
- Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers)Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers)Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mayde Rosen
19 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- General Health Professions 599
- Epidemiology 272
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 182
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 145
- Economics and Econometrics 128
Countries citing papers authored by Mayde Rosen
This map shows the geographic impact of Mayde Rosen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mayde Rosen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mayde Rosen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mayde Rosen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mayde Rosen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mayde Rosen. The network helps show where Mayde Rosen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mayde Rosen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mayde Rosen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mayde Rosen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mayde Rosen. Mayde Rosen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 80 | |
| 5 | 166 | |
| 6 | 218 | |
| 7 | 103 | |
| 8 | 78 | |
| 9 | Electronic Prescribing Systems | 1 |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 292 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | Recommendations for Comparing Electronic Prescribing Systems | 2 |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 3 |
About Mayde Rosen
Mayde Rosen is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Occupational Therapy and Family Practice, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (118 citations), General Health Professions (599 citations) and Speech and Hearing (98 citations). Mayde Rosen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kitty S. Chan, Rita Mangione‐Smith, Emmett B. Keeler, Jill A. Marsteller, Stephen M. Shortell, Marjorie L. Pearson, Peter Mendel, Matthias Schonlau, James W. Varni and Tasha M. Burwinkle. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Care, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Journal of General Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.