Maxwell J. Scott

4.3k total citations
79 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Maxwell J. Scott is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Insect Science and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Maxwell J. Scott has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Molecular Biology, 45 papers in Insect Science and 12 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Maxwell J. Scott's work include Insect Resistance and Genetics (32 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (28 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (27 papers). Maxwell J. Scott is often cited by papers focused on Insect Resistance and Genetics (32 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (28 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (27 papers). Maxwell J. Scott collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Panama. Maxwell J. Scott's co-authors include Jörg C. Heinrich, Carolina Concha, Esther J. Belikoff, Fang Li, Ying Yan, Helen L. Fitzsimons, Anja Schiemann, Fang Li, Rebecca A. Henry and Susan Stasiuk and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Maxwell J. Scott

76 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Maxwell J. Scott United States 31 1.7k 1.2k 575 274 191 79 2.4k
Giuseppe Saccone Italy 22 848 0.5× 1.1k 0.9× 703 1.2× 123 0.4× 246 1.3× 42 1.7k
Anjiang Tan China 27 1.1k 0.7× 864 0.7× 475 0.8× 233 0.9× 557 2.9× 36 1.8k
Giuseppe Gargiulo Italy 22 842 0.5× 627 0.5× 627 1.1× 228 0.8× 204 1.1× 74 1.8k
Gregor Bucher Germany 29 2.0k 1.2× 694 0.6× 538 0.9× 505 1.8× 568 3.0× 65 2.5k
Masataka G. Suzuki Japan 27 1.6k 0.9× 1.2k 1.0× 1.1k 2.0× 365 1.3× 465 2.4× 77 2.7k
David Brawand Switzerland 8 1.2k 0.7× 329 0.3× 944 1.6× 334 1.2× 504 2.6× 10 2.2k
Jeremy Lynch United States 19 894 0.5× 343 0.3× 520 0.9× 185 0.7× 257 1.3× 50 1.5k
Tatsuhiko Kadowaki Japan 32 1.3k 0.8× 933 0.8× 716 1.2× 269 1.0× 602 3.2× 66 2.8k
Rodney N. Nagoshi United States 35 2.8k 1.6× 2.2k 1.8× 646 1.1× 1.1k 4.2× 185 1.0× 83 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Maxwell J. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maxwell J. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maxwell J. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maxwell J. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maxwell J. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maxwell J. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maxwell J. Scott. The network helps show where Maxwell J. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maxwell J. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maxwell J. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maxwell J. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maxwell J. Scott. Maxwell J. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Watson, David, et al.. (2024). Antennal transcriptome analysis reveals sensory receptors potentially associated with host detection in the livestock pest Lucilia cuprina. Parasites & Vectors. 17(1). 308–308. 2 indexed citations
2.
Baars, Oliver, et al.. (2023). Development of transgenic corn planthopper Peregrinus maidis that express the tetracycline transactivator . Insect Molecular Biology. 32(4). 363–375. 2 indexed citations
3.
Fresia, Pablo, et al.. (2023). Identification and functional analysis of Cochliomyia hominivorax U6 gene promoters. Insect Molecular Biology. 32(6). 716–724. 2 indexed citations
5.
Kandul, Nikolay P., Junru Liu, Anna Buchman, et al.. (2022). Precision Guided Sterile Males Suppress Populations of an Invasive Crop Pest. 1(4). 372–385. 21 indexed citations
6.
Kandul, Nikolay P., Esther J. Belikoff, Anna Buchman, et al.. (2021). Genetically Encoded CRISPR Components Yield Efficient Gene Editing in the Invasive Pest Drosophila suzukii. The CRISPR Journal. 4(5). 739–751. 14 indexed citations
7.
Vella, Michael R., et al.. (2020). Development and testing of a novel killer–rescue self-limiting gene drive system in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 287(1925). 20192994–20192994. 25 indexed citations
8.
Scott, Maxwell J., Joshua B. Benoit, Rebecca J. Davis, et al.. (2020). Genomic analyses of a livestock pest, the New World screwworm, find potential targets for genetic control programs. Communications Biology. 3(1). 424–424. 23 indexed citations
9.
Davis, Rebecca J., Esther J. Belikoff, Elizabeth H. Scholl, Fang Li, & Maxwell J. Scott. (2018). no blokes Is Essential for Male Viability and X Chromosome Gene Expression in the Australian Sheep Blowfly. Current Biology. 28(12). 1987–1992.e3. 19 indexed citations
10.
Dearden, Peter K., Neil J. Gemmell, Ocean Mercier, et al.. (2017). The potential for the use of gene drives for pest control in New Zealand: a perspective. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 48(4). 225–244. 58 indexed citations
11.
Anstead, Clare A., Philip Batterham, Pasi K. Korhonen, et al.. (2016). A blow to the fly — Lucilia cuprina draft genome and transcriptome to support advances in biology and biotechnology. Biotechnology Advances. 34(5). 605–620. 21 indexed citations
12.
Concha, Carolina, P. Azhahianambi, Felix D. Guerrero, et al.. (2016). A transgenic male-only strain of the New World screwworm for an improved control program using the sterile insect technique. BMC Biology. 14(1). 72–72. 55 indexed citations
13.
Yan, Ying & Maxwell J. Scott. (2015). A transgenic embryonic sexing system for the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Scientific Reports. 5(1). 16090–16090. 47 indexed citations
14.
Li, Fang & Maxwell J. Scott. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the white and Sex lethal loci in the invasive pest, Drosophila suzukii. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 469(4). 911–916. 73 indexed citations
15.
Belikoff, Esther J., et al.. (2015). Dosage Compensation of X-Linked Muller Element F Genes but Not X-Linked Transgenes in the Australian Sheep Blowfly. PLoS ONE. 10(10). e0141544–e0141544. 20 indexed citations
16.
Fitzsimons, Helen L., et al.. (2013). The Histone Deacetylase HDAC4 Regulates Long-Term Memory in Drosophila. PLoS ONE. 8(12). e83903–e83903. 55 indexed citations
17.
Scott, Maxwell J., Anja Schiemann, Carolina Concha, et al.. (2010). Organisation and expression of a cluster of yolk protein genes in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Genetica. 139(1). 63–70. 11 indexed citations
18.
Li, Fang, Anja Schiemann, & Maxwell J. Scott. (2007). Incorporation of the Noncoding roX RNAs Alters the Chromatin-Binding Specificity of the Drosophila MSL1/MSL2 Complex. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 28(4). 1252–1264. 48 indexed citations
20.
Scott, Maxwell J. & John C. Lucchesi. (1991). Structure and expression of the Drosophila melanogaster gene encoding 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase. Gene. 109(2). 177–183. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026