Max V. Sigal
- Microbiology top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy 3
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 2
- Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry 2
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms 2
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 3
-
- Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms 4
-
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus 3
-
- Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals 2
- Co-authors
- Paul F. WileyKoert GerzonEdwin H. FlynnFrederick J. MarshallRobert R. ChauvetteRobert M. EllisMary A. RootRobert C. Anderson
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (9 papers)Diabetes (1 paper)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Max V. Sigal
15 papers receiving 438 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Microbiology 12
- Pharmacology 179
- Organic Chemistry 242
- Molecular Medicine 26
- Spectroscopy 82
Countries citing papers authored by Max V. Sigal
This map shows the geographic impact of Max V. Sigal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max V. Sigal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max V. Sigal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Max V. Sigal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max V. Sigal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max V. Sigal. The network helps show where Max V. Sigal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Max V. Sigal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1963 | 11 | |
| 2 | 1962 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1961 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1959 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1958 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1958 | 25 | |
| 7 | 1958 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1957 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1957 | 117 | |
| 10 | 1956 | 35 | |
| 11 | 1956 | 29 | |
| 12 | 1956 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1955 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1955 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1954 | 174 | |
| 16 | Studies of phosphorus intoxication. I. Changes in blood, urine, and tissues of dogs poisoned with phosphorus. | 1954 | 1 |
About Max V. Sigal
Max V. Sigal is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Pharmacology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (3 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (2 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (2 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (2 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (12 citations), Pharmacology (179 citations) and Organic Chemistry (242 citations). Max V. Sigal has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul F. Wiley, Koert Gerzon, Edwin H. Flynn, Frederick J. Marshall, Robert R. Chauvette, Robert M. Ellis, Mary A. Root, Robert C. Anderson, H. R. Sullivan and C. Ainsworth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Diabetes and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.