This map shows the geographic impact of Max Scheler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Scheler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Scheler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Scheler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Scheler. The network helps show where Max Scheler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Max Scheler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Max Scheler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Max Scheler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Max Scheler. Max Scheler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Scheler, Max. (2007). Vom Umsturz der Werte : Abhandlungen und Aufsätze. Bouvier eBooks.2 indexed citations
3.
Scheler, Max. (2005). On the Rehabilitation of Virtue. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. 79(1). 21–37.6 indexed citations
4.
Scheler, Max & Manfred S. Frings. (2004). Das Ressentiment im Aufbau der Moralen. Vittorio Klostermann eBooks.24 indexed citations
5.
Scheler, Max, et al.. (1994). Schriften zur Anthropologie.4 indexed citations
6.
Scheler, Max, et al.. (1993). Problèmes de sociologie de la connaissance.
7.
Scheler, Max, et al.. (1991). Le formalisme en éthique et l'éthique matériale des valeurs : essai nouveau pour fonder un personnalisme éthique. Gallimard eBooks.4 indexed citations
8.
Scheler, Max. (1985). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. 5(3).102 indexed citations
Scheler, Max & Manfred S. Frings. (1979). Die Zukunft des Kapitalismus ; Tod und Fortleben ; Zum Phänomen des Tragischen.
11.
Scheler, Max & Manfred S. Frings. (1977). Erkenntnis und Arbeit : eine Studie über Wert und Grenzen des pragmatischen Motivs in der Erkenntnis der Welt. V. Klostermann eBooks.5 indexed citations
12.
Scheler, Max & Manfred S. Frings. (1973). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie ; Die deutsche Philosophie der Gegenwart. Francke eBooks.16 indexed citations
13.
Scheler, Max, et al.. (1973). Max Scheler : ou, La phénoménologie des valeurs.
14.
Scheler, Max, et al.. (1960). Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft. Tijdschrift voor Philosophie. 17(1).38 indexed citations
15.
Scheler, Max, et al.. (1958). Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Band I : Zur Ethik und Erkenntnislehre, 2. Tijdschrift voor Philosophie. 20(1).4 indexed citations
16.
Scheler, Max, et al.. (1957). Zur Ethik und Erkenntnislehre. Francke eBooks.1 indexed citations
17.
Scheler, Max, et al.. (1956). Le formalisme en éthique et l'éthique matériale des valeurs. Revue de métaphysique et de morale. 61(3).5 indexed citations
18.
Scheler, Max. (1955). Liebe und Erkenntnis. Francke eBooks.2 indexed citations
19.
Scheler, Max. (1954). Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik : neuer Versuch der Grundlegung eines ethischen Personalismus. Francke eBooks.58 indexed citations
20.
Scheler, Max, et al.. (1954). Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik 4. Tijdschrift voor Philosophie. 16(3).49 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.