Max D. Miller

15 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Max D. Miller
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Family Practice 19
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 135
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 106
  • Genetics 35
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
Replace Steven J. Kasten with:
Steven J. Kasten United States
Michael T. Modic United States
Steven Overman United States
James A. Sliwa United States
Melanie Anderson Canada
Elaine S. Gould United States
P. F. Jensen Denmark
G. Stucki Germany
Tsuey‐Yuan Huang Taiwan
Robert B. Patterson United States
Max D. Miller relative to Steven J. Kasten United States Steven J. Kasten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Steven J. Kasten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max D. Miller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max D. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max D. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max D. Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max D. Miller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max D. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max D. Miller. The network helps show where Max D. Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Max D. Miller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max D. Miller Line = papers co-authored together Max D. Miller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the Visual Analogue Scale.
1993252
2 1985119
3 197836
4
Colposcopic accuracy in a residency training program: defining competency and proficiency.
199328
5 199725
6 198725
7 199717
8 198816
9 198714
10
Colposcopy practice and training in family practice residency programs.
199210
11
Facial features of neurologic syndromes
19807
12 19996
13 19825
14 19972
15 19822
16 19881
17 19791
18 19821

About Max D. Miller

Max D. Miller is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Anatomy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers), Medical and Biological Sciences (2 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (19 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (135 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (106 citations), Genetics (35 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations). Max D. Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Daron G. Ferris, M Matsuzaki, W S Kemper, James T. Ross, Genta Osakada, K P Gallagher, William B. Strong, Maribeth H. Johnson, Daniel W. Rahn and J McFarlane. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Heart, Educational and Psychological Measurement and Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact