Maude Laliberté

576 total citations
36 papers, 315 citations indexed

About

Maude Laliberté is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Maude Laliberté has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 315 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 7 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Maude Laliberté's work include Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (7 papers). Maude Laliberté is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (7 papers). Maude Laliberté collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Maude Laliberté's co-authors include Debbie Ehrmann Feldman, Matthew Hunt, Kadija Perreault, Bryn Williams–Jones, François Desmeules, Simon Deslauriers, Barbara Mazer, Anne Hudon, Amélie Lavoie and Debbie Feldman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physical Therapy and Disability and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Maude Laliberté

27 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Maude Laliberté
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • General Health Professions 162
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 70
  • Pharmacology 68
  • Economics and Econometrics 47
  • Occupational Therapy 42
Ruth Cox Australia
Dawn Ernstzen South Africa
Barbara J. Burgel United States
Tracy Bury Ireland
Sue Lukersmith Australia
Carol Coole United Kingdom
Carley Ouellette Canada
Christine McCallum United States
Urban Schwegler Switzerland
Sophie Anaf Australia
Ruth Cox Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Maude Laliberté
Maude Laliberté · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Maude Laliberté
Maude Laliberté · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Maude Laliberté

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maude Laliberté's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maude Laliberté with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maude Laliberté more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maude Laliberté

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maude Laliberté. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maude Laliberté. The network helps show where Maude Laliberté may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maude Laliberté

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maude Laliberté. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maude Laliberté based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maude Laliberté. Maude Laliberté is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 6
5 4
6 0
7 7
8 12
9 9
10 12
11 48
12 1
13 3
14 15
15
L’utilisation du TENS en physiothérapie : la situation particulière des soins palliatifs oncologiques
0
16 42
17 18
18 3
19 4
20 0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026