Maud Robert
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 1%
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Obesity and Health Practices
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments 11
- Pharmacy 11
- Obesity and Health Practices 11
- Co-authors
- Emmanuel Disse (24 shared papers)Gilles Poncet (15 shared papers)C Gouillat (12 shared papers)Hubert Vidal (8 shared papers)Stéphanie Chanon (8 shared papers)Élise Pelascini (15 shared papers)François Mion (9 shared papers)Étienne Lefai (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Obesity Surgery (19 papers)Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (9 papers)Surgical Endoscopy (3 papers)Endoscopy (3 papers)Diabetes (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Maud Robert
78 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Gastroenterology 356
- Pharmacy 151
- Surgery 1.3k
- Physiology 618
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 124
Countries citing papers authored by Maud Robert
This map shows the geographic impact of Maud Robert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud Robert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud Robert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maud Robert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud Robert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud Robert. The network helps show where Maud Robert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maud Robert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 268 |
| 2 | 2018 | 155 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 143 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 97 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 87 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 87 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 82 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 74 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 55 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 24 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 24 |
About Maud Robert
Maud Robert is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Pharmacy, Surgery, Physiology and Aging, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (48 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (24 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (15 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (12 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (11 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (11 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (5 papers) and Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (356 citations), Pharmacy (151 citations), Surgery (1.3k citations), Physiology (618 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (124 citations). Maud Robert has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Disse, Gilles Poncet, C Gouillat, Hubert Vidal, Stéphanie Chanon, Élise Pelascini, François Mion, Étienne Lefai, Martine Laville and Sabine Roman. Their work appears in journals such as Obesity Surgery, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Surgical Endoscopy, Endoscopy and Diabetes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.