Maud Robert

78 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial 2019 · 268 citations
268201920262021202350100150200250

Peers

Maud Robert
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Gastroenterology 356
  • Pharmacy 151
  • Surgery 1.3k
  • Physiology 618
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 124
Replace J. P. Galmiche with:
J. P. Galmiche France
Jesse Lamsam United States
Mark E. Stark United States
Christopher Barnett Australia
S. Fasth Sweden
Swapna Mahurkar‐Joshi United States
Isaac Samuel United States
Kaichi Kida Japan
Henry N. Harkins United States
R. M. Preshaw Canada
Maud Robert relative to J. P. Galmiche France J. P. Galmiche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
J. P. Galmiche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maud Robert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maud Robert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud Robert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud Robert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maud Robert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud Robert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud Robert. The network helps show where Maud Robert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maud Robert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maud Robert Line = papers co-authored together Maud Robert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2019268
2 2018155
3 2019143
4 201697
5 201387
6 201587
7 201582
8 201774
9 201455
10 201046
11 201640
12 201436
13 201434
14 201131
15 201829
16 200727
17 201627
18 201226
19 201024
20 202124

About Maud Robert

Maud Robert is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Pharmacy, Surgery, Physiology and Aging, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (48 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (24 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (15 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (12 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (11 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (11 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (5 papers) and Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (356 citations), Pharmacy (151 citations), Surgery (1.3k citations), Physiology (618 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (124 citations). Maud Robert has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Disse, Gilles Poncet, C Gouillat, Hubert Vidal, Stéphanie Chanon, Élise Pelascini, François Mion, Étienne Lefai, Martine Laville and Sabine Roman. Their work appears in journals such as Obesity Surgery, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Surgical Endoscopy, Endoscopy and Diabetes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026