Mattis Geiger

1.3k total citations
32 papers, 823 citations indexed

About

Mattis Geiger is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mattis Geiger has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 823 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Clinical Psychology, 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mattis Geiger's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (5 papers). Mattis Geiger is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (5 papers). Mattis Geiger collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and United States. Mattis Geiger's co-authors include Oliver Wilhelm, Sonja M. Geiger, Sally Olderbak, Gabriel Olaru, Richard D. Roberts, Meghan W. Brenneman, Lau Lilleholt, Ingo Zettler, Robert Böhm and Cornelia Betsch and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Mattis Geiger

31 papers receiving 800 citations

Peers

Mattis Geiger

CP

ECP

CN

SPS

SP

Olivier Desrichard Switzerland

Kristina Wilson United States

Cara Wong Australia

Christopher T. Begeny United Kingdom

Adolfo Di Crosta Italy

Marleen Gillebaart Netherlands

Pasquale La Malva Italy

Dan Romer United States

Frank Wieber Germany

Olivier Desrichard Switzerland

Mattis Geiger

112 ×0.5

CP

226 ×1.2

ECP

191 ×1.1

CN

154 ×0.9

SPS

145 ×0.9

SP

Citations per year, relative to Mattis Geiger Mattis Geiger (= 1×) peers Olivier Desrichard

Countries citing papers authored by Mattis Geiger

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mattis Geiger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mattis Geiger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mattis Geiger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mattis Geiger

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mattis Geiger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mattis Geiger. The network helps show where Mattis Geiger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mattis Geiger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mattis Geiger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mattis Geiger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mattis Geiger. Mattis Geiger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Geiger, Mattis, et al.. (2024). Study protocol of the planetary health action survey PACE: a serial cross-sectional survey to assess the readiness to act against climate change. BMJ Open. 14(11). e091093–e091093. 1 indexed citations

2.

Geiger, Mattis, Sally Olderbak, & Oliver Wilhelm. (2024). “Show Me What You Got”: The Nomological Network of the Ability to Pose Facial Emotion Expressions. Journal of Intelligence. 12(3). 27–27.

3.

Geiger, Mattis, et al.. (2023). Do you mind a closer look? A jingle-jangle fallacy perspective on mindfulness. European Journal of Personality. 38(2). 365–387. 14 indexed citations

4.

Jenny, Mirjam A., et al.. (2023). Heatwaves and their health risks: knowledge, risk perceptions and behaviours of the German population in summer 2022. European Journal of Public Health. 33(5). 841–843. 3 indexed citations

5.

Machida, Masaki, Takako Kojima, H. Akiko Popiel, et al.. (2022). Development, validity, and reliability of the Japanese version of the 7C of vaccination readiness scale. American Journal of Infection Control. 51(4). 426–433. 11 indexed citations

6.

Geiger, Mattis, Lau Lilleholt, Ingo Zettler, et al.. (2022). Measuring parents’ readiness to vaccinate themselves and their children against COVID-19. Vaccine. 40(28). 3825–3834. 20 indexed citations

7.

Liu, Xinyang, Mattis Geiger, Changsong Zhou, & Andrea Hildebrandt. (2022). Individual differences in white matter microstructure of the face processing brain network are more differentiated from global fibers with increasing ability. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 14075–14075. 3 indexed citations

8.

Geiger, Mattis, et al.. (2021). The Good, the Bad, and the Clever: Faking Ability as a Socio-Emotional Ability?. Journal of Intelligence. 9(1). 13–13. 10 indexed citations

9.

Geiger, Mattis, Lau Lilleholt, Ingo Zettler, et al.. (2021). Measuring parents’ readiness to vaccinate themselves and their children against COVID-19. PubMed. 40(28). 3825–3834. 1 indexed citations

10.

Geiger, Mattis, Lau Lilleholt, Ingo Zettler, et al.. (2021). Measuring the 7Cs of Vaccination Readiness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 38(4). 261–269. 124 indexed citations

11.

Olderbak, Sally, et al.. (2021). Emotion expression abilities and psychopathy.. Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment. 12(6). 546–559. 9 indexed citations

12.

Ferentzi, Eszter, et al.. (2021). Interaction Between Sex and Cardiac Interoceptive Accuracy in Measures of Induced Pain. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 577961–577961. 11 indexed citations

13.

Ferentzi, Eszter, et al.. (2020). Examining the Factor Structure and Validity of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. Journal of Personality Assessment. 103(5). 675–684. 54 indexed citations

14.

Gruss, Sascha, Mattis Geiger, Philipp Werner, et al.. (2019). Multi-Modal Signals for Analyzing Pain Responses to Thermal and Electrical Stimuli. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 50 indexed citations

15.

Gruss, Sascha, Mattis Geiger, Philipp Werner, et al.. (2019). Multi-Modal Signals for Analyzing Pain Responses to Thermal and Electrical Stimuli. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 13 indexed citations

16.

Geiger, Sonja M., Mattis Geiger, & Oliver Wilhelm. (2019). Environment-Specific vs. General Knowledge and Their Role in Pro-environmental Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 718–718. 125 indexed citations

17.

Geiger, Mattis, et al.. (2018). The “g” in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 2153–2153. 21 indexed citations

18.

Jackson, Simon, et al.. (2018). It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language. PLoS ONE. 13(5). e0196384–e0196384. 10 indexed citations

19.

Pfattheicher, Stefan, Mattis Geiger, Johanna Hartung, Selina Weiss, & Simon Schindler. (2017). Old Wine in New Bottles? The Case of Self–Compassion and Neuroticism. European Journal of Personality. 31(2). 160–169. 74 indexed citations

20.

Olderbak, Sally, Oliver Wilhelm, Gabriel Olaru, et al.. (2015). A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 1503–1503. 163 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact