Matthias Moosmann

2.4k citations
17 papers · 1.8k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Matthias Moosmann

17 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Matthias Moosmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 357
  • Signal Processing 146
  • Neurology 110
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 147
Replace Johanna M. Zumer with:
Johanna M. Zumer United Kingdom
Maria João Rosa United Kingdom
Wilkin Chau Canada
Tracy Warbrick Germany
Jukka Remes Finland
Tuomo Starck Finland
Sonia Crottaz‐Herbette Switzerland
Jörn Kastner Germany
Michelle Moerel Netherlands
Juliane Britz Switzerland
Matthias Moosmann relative to Johanna M. Zumer United Kingdom Johanna M. Zumer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Johanna M. Zumer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthias Moosmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthias Moosmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthias Moosmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthias Moosmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthias Moosmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthias Moosmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthias Moosmann. The network helps show where Matthias Moosmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthias Moosmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthias Moosmann Line = papers co-authored together Matthias Moosmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2003464
2 2008324
3 2005235
4 2008117
5 201092
6 200791
7 200787
8 200383
9 200977
10 200164
11 200553
12 200850
13 200527
14 200915
15
Single-trial ERP-FMRI: The electric and hemodynamic correlates of expectancy in target processing
20061
16 20081
17 20051

About Matthias Moosmann

Matthias Moosmann is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Signal Processing, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (3 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (1 paper) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (357 citations), Signal Processing (146 citations), Neurology (110 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (147 citations). Matthias Moosmann has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Arno Villringer, Petra Ritter, Kenneth Hugdahl, Helge Nordby, Karsten Specht, Birol Taskin, Felix Blankenburg, Tom Eichele, Sebastian Thees and Hellmuth Obrig. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Psychophysiology, NeuroImage, Brain Research, Human Brain Mapping and Cerebral Cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact