Matthias C. Angermeyer
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Herbert MatschingerSteffi G. Riedel‐HellerAnja BusseMichael BeckReinhold KilianAnita HolzingerHans-Ulrich WilmsC Mory
- Topics
- Health and Medical Studies (5 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers)
- Journals
- Social Science & MedicineThe British Journal of PsychiatrySocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Matthias C. Angermeyer
13 papers receiving 363 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Clinical Psychology 209
- Social Psychology 183
- Psychiatry and Mental health 171
- General Health Professions 102
- Sociology and Political Science 57
Countries citing papers authored by Matthias C. Angermeyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthias C. Angermeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthias C. Angermeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthias C. Angermeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthias C. Angermeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthias C. Angermeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthias C. Angermeyer. The network helps show where Matthias C. Angermeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthias C. Angermeyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthias C. Angermeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthias C. Angermeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthias C. Angermeyer. Matthias C. Angermeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 101 | |
| 11 | 159 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 4 |
About Matthias C. Angermeyer
Matthias C. Angermeyer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and General Health Professions, having authored 13 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Medical Studies (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (171 citations), Clinical Psychology (209 citations) and Social Psychology (183 citations). Matthias C. Angermeyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Herbert Matschinger, Steffi G. Riedel‐Heller, Anja Busse, Michael Beck, Reinhold Kilian, Anita Holzinger, Hans-Ulrich Wilms, C Mory, Dietrich Klusmann and Dirk Heider. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.