Matthew Wright

82 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Matthew Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Pharmacology 284
  • Hematology 249
  • Virology 104
  • Internal Medicine 61
  • Pharmaceutical Science 98
Replace Mark J. Rose with:
Mark J. Rose United States
Suresh K. Balani United States
Philip A. Harris United States
Bernard P. Murray United States
Kevin B. Alton United States
G.M. Anantharamaiah United States
Lalitha Iyer United States
Liang‐Shang Gan United States
Atsushi Kurihara Japan
Jürgen Venitz United States
Matthew Wright relative to Mark J. Rose United States Mark J. Rose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Mark J. Rose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Wright. The network helps show where Matthew Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Wright Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001139
2 2014126
3 201981
4 200370
5 199967
6
Hepatic metabolism and biliary excretion of Taxol in rats and humans.
199360
7 200059
8 200358
9 200844
10 199243
11 199843
12 199542
13 200242
14
Drug disposition and effects in the fetus.
199142
15 199440
16 199335
17 199635
18 199832
19 200030
20 202029

About Matthew Wright

Matthew Wright is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Virology, Hematology, Oncology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (21 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (19 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (10 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (10 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (7 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (7 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers) and Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (284 citations), Hematology (249 citations), Virology (104 citations), Internal Medicine (61 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (98 citations). Matthew Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Fakhreddin Jamali, Cornelis E. C. A. Hop, Pancras C. Wong, Robert M. Knabb, Ruth R. Wexler, Xingrong Liu, Richard Alexander, Donald Pinto, Patrick Y. S. Lam and Mimi L. Quan. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026