Matthew M. Osmond
- Genetics top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Claire de MazancourtChristopher A. KlausmeierSarah P. OttoDolph SchluterKen ThompsonGretchen E. KaufmanMilani ChaloupkaColin T. Kremer
- Topics
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (12 papers)Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers)Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers)
- Journals
- The American NaturalistGeneticsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Matthew M. Osmond
16 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Genetics 278
- Ecology 168
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 164
- Sociology and Political Science 109
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 88
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew M. Osmond
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew M. Osmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew M. Osmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew M. Osmond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew M. Osmond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew M. Osmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew M. Osmond. The network helps show where Matthew M. Osmond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew M. Osmond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew M. Osmond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew M. Osmond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew M. Osmond. Matthew M. Osmond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 68 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 88 | |
| 17 | 55 |
About Matthew M. Osmond
Matthew M. Osmond is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (12 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (55 citations), Genetics (278 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (164 citations). Matthew M. Osmond has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Claire de Mazancourt, Christopher A. Klausmeier, Sarah P. Otto, Dolph Schluter, Ken Thompson, Gretchen E. Kaufman, Milani Chaloupka, Colin T. Kremer, Elena Litchman and Graham Coop. Their work appears in journals such as The American Naturalist, Genetics and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.