Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Dolph Schluter
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dolph Schluter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dolph Schluter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dolph Schluter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dolph Schluter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dolph Schluter. The network helps show where Dolph Schluter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dolph Schluter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dolph Schluter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dolph Schluter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dolph Schluter. Dolph Schluter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wray, Gregory A., Hopi E. Hoekstra, Douglas J. Futuyma, et al.. (2014). Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? - COUNTERPOINT No, all is well. Nature. 514(7521).37 indexed citations
11.
Harmon, Luke J., Jonathan B. Losos, T. Jonathan Davies, et al.. (2010). EARLY BURSTS OF BODY SIZE AND SHAPE EVOLUTION ARE RARE IN COMPARATIVE DATA. Evolution. 64(8). no–no.667 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Chan, Yingguang Frank, Melissa E. Marks, Felicity C. Jones, et al.. (2009). Adaptive Evolution of Pelvic Reduction in Sticklebacks by Recurrent Deletion of a Pitx1 Enhancer. Science. 327(5963). 302–305.751 indexed citations breakdown →
Colosimo, Pamela F., Guadalupe Villarreal, Mark Dickson, et al.. (2005). Widespread Parallel Evolution in Sticklebacks by Repeated Fixation of Ectodysplasin Alleles. Science. 307(5717). 1928–1933.1134 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Schluter, Dolph, et al.. (2001). Declining interspecific competition during character displacement: Summoning the ghost of competition past. Evolutionary ecology research. 3(2). 209–220.74 indexed citations
16.
Schluter, Dolph. (2000). The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation.3988 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Mooers, Arne Ø., Steven M. Vamosi, & Dolph Schluter. (1999). Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary models of trait evolution: sexual selection and speciation in Cranes (Gruinae). The American Naturalist. 154. 249–259.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.