Matthew Loy

4.3k total citations
2 papers, 7 citations indexed

About

Matthew Loy is a scholar working on Information Systems, History and Philosophy of Science and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew Loy has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 7 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Information Systems, 1 paper in History and Philosophy of Science and 1 paper in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Matthew Loy's work include Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (1 paper) and Open Education and E-Learning (1 paper). Matthew Loy is often cited by papers focused on Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (1 paper) and Open Education and E-Learning (1 paper). Matthew Loy collaborates with scholars based in . Matthew Loy's co-authors include Ronald D. Snyder and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Electronic Publishing and Humanities Commons CORE (Modern Language Association / Columbia University).

In The Last Decade

Matthew Loy

2 papers receiving 6 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Matthew Loy	2	3	2	2	2	1	2	7
Angela Allan United States	2	4 1.3×		1 0.5×			3	5
Juliana Rocha Franco Brazil	2	2 0.7×		1 0.5×			6	2
Florian Homann Germany	2	2 0.7×	1 0.5×			1 1.0×	10	5
Séverine Behra France	2	2 0.7×					4	4
S. Das India	2	2 0.7×					4	6
Hadi Hassan Malaysia	3	2 0.7×			1 0.5×		5	7
Kimberly J. Stern United States	2	2 0.7×	1 0.5×				7	8
Victoria Thomas United States	1	2 0.7×	1 0.5×				2	4
Achim Geisenhanslüke Germany	3	4 1.3×					30	14
H. Nguyen Vietnam	2	2 0.7×					6	6

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Loy

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Loy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Loy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Loy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Loy

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Loy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Loy. The network helps show where Matthew Loy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Loy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Loy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Loy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Loy. Matthew Loy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

2 of 2 papers shown

1.

Loy, Matthew, et al.. (2018). Reimagining the Digital Monograph: Design Thinking to Build New Tools for Researchers. Journal of Electronic Publishing. 21(1). 6 indexed citations

2.

Loy, Matthew, et al.. (2016). Reimagining the Digital Monograph: Design Thinking to Build New Tools for Researchers, A JSTOR Labs Report - DRAFT FOR COMMENT. Humanities Commons CORE (Modern Language Association / Columbia University). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact