Séverine Behra
About
In The Last Decade
Séverine Behra
1 paper receiving 1 citation
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref
| Name | h | Career | Trend | Papers | Cites | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Séverine Behra France | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | ||
| Nadia Sadiq Pakistan | 2 | 3 0.8× | 3 3.0× | 2 | 4 | |||||
| Victoria Thomas United States | 1 | 2 1.0× | 2 1.0× | 2 | 4 | |||||
| María Elvira Ríos Chile | 2 | 3 1.5× | 2 1.0× | 2 | 5 | |||||
| Adel R. Boueiz United States | 2 | 2 1.0× | 3 | 3 | ||||||
| Isabella Leite Lucas United Kingdom | 2 | 2 1.0× | 1 1.0× | 2 | 6 | |||||
| C. Graham Singapore | 2 | 2 1.0× | 2 | 5 | ||||||
| Nasif Ahmed China | 2 | 2 1.0× | 3 | 6 | ||||||
| Edona Berisha Kida United Kingdom | 2 | 2 1.0× | 1 1.0× | 2 | 3 | |||||
| Shara Holzberg United States | 1 | 2 1.0× | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Christine Herlihy United States | 2 | 2 1.0× | 7 | 6 |
Countries citing papers authored by Séverine Behra
This map shows the geographic impact of Séverine Behra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Séverine Behra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Séverine Behra more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Séverine Behra
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Séverine Behra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Séverine Behra. The network helps show where Séverine Behra may publish in the future.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.