Matthew J. Brierley
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Surgery
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul R. BenjaminMark S. YeomanR. J. BalmentCatherine R. McCrohanWeiqun LuDaniela RiccardiAnn AshworthNiovi Santama
- Topics
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (10 papers)Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (8 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkRussia
In The Last Decade
Matthew J. Brierley
19 papers receiving 703 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 356
- Surgery 227
- Molecular Biology 167
- Pharmacology 138
- Ecology 130
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew J. Brierley
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew J. Brierley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew J. Brierley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew J. Brierley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew J. Brierley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew J. Brierley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew J. Brierley. The network helps show where Matthew J. Brierley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew J. Brierley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew J. Brierley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew J. Brierley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew J. Brierley. Matthew J. Brierley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | |
| 2 | 57 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 70 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 92 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 51 | |
| 19 | 32 |
About Matthew J. Brierley
Matthew J. Brierley is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 718 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (10 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (8 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (356 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (37 citations) and Sensory Systems (46 citations). Matthew J. Brierley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Paul R. Benjamin, Mark S. Yeoman, R. J. Balment, Catherine R. McCrohan, Weiqun Lu, Daniela Riccardi, Ann Ashworth, Niovi Santama, Ian R. Mellor and P.N.R. Usherwood. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Neuroscience and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.