Matthew I. Isaak
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Education
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Jesse MartinKimron L. ShapiroMichael E. J. MassonMarcel Adam JustCindy J. LaharJane E. RaymondDavid D. PerkinsSherry L. Fawcett
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers)Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaExperimental Brain ResearchJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Matthew I. Isaak
14 papers receiving 363 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Cognitive Neuroscience 279
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 85
- Education 38
- Social Psychology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew I. Isaak
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew I. Isaak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew I. Isaak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew I. Isaak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew I. Isaak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew I. Isaak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew I. Isaak. The network helps show where Matthew I. Isaak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew I. Isaak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew I. Isaak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew I. Isaak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew I. Isaak. Matthew I. Isaak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 90 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 18 |
About Matthew I. Isaak
Matthew I. Isaak is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (279 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (85 citations). Matthew I. Isaak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jesse Martin, Kimron L. Shapiro, Michael E. J. Masson, Marcel Adam Just, Cindy J. Lahar, Jane E. Raymond, David D. Perkins and Sherry L. Fawcett. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Experimental Brain Research and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.