Matthew D. Johnson

1.2k total citations
57 papers, 744 citations indexed

About

Matthew D. Johnson is a scholar working on Surgery, Small Animals and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew D. Johnson has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 744 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Surgery, 19 papers in Small Animals and 18 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Matthew D. Johnson's work include Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (17 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (13 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (11 papers). Matthew D. Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (17 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (13 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (11 papers). Matthew D. Johnson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Matthew D. Johnson's co-authors include Inga S. Grills, Hong Ye, R.E. Olson, Ann Maitz, F. A. Mann, Kurt Meyer, Daniel Krauss, Moussa Mansour, Nirav Sheth and Yinji Ma and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Matthew D. Johnson

54 papers receiving 720 citations

Peers

Matthew D. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 236
  • Biomedical Engineering 154
  • Surgery 136
  • Epidemiology 133
  • Genetics 117
Replace Ekrem Ünal with:
Ekrem Ünal Türkiye
Eng H. Ooi Australia
Tulio A. Valdez United States
Rachel Edwards Australia
Kidong Eom South Korea
Akira Fujikawa Japan
Won Moon South Korea
Karen K. Cornell United States
David R. DeLone United States
James McCaul United Kingdom
Ekrem Ünal Türkiye View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Matthew D. Johnson
Matthew D. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Matthew D. Johnson
Matthew D. Johnson · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew D. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew D. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew D. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew D. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew D. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew D. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew D. Johnson. The network helps show where Matthew D. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew D. Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew D. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew D. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew D. Johnson. Matthew D. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 4
4 3
5 1
6 18
7 3
8 4
9 2
10 10
11 14
12 13
13 1
14 37
15 100
16 4
17 30
18 22
19
Similar outcome of elderly patients in intergroup trial 0096: Cisplatin, etoposide, and thoracic radiotherapy administered once or twice daily in limited stage small cell lung carcinoma.
7
20 64

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026