Daniel D. Lewis

164 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Daniel D. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Small Animals 1.8k
  • Equine 154
  • Rehabilitation 606
  • Surgery 2.1k
  • Epidemiology 1.3k
Replace Randy J. Boudrieau with:
Randy J. Boudrieau United States
Antonio Pozzi United States
D. N. Aron United States
Simon C. Roe United States
Sorrel Langley‐Hobbs United Kingdom
John Innes United Kingdom
Sharon C. Kerwin United States
Charles E. DeCamp United States
H. de Rooster Belgium
P. M. Montavon Switzerland
Daniel D. Lewis relative to Randy J. Boudrieau United States Randy J. Boudrieau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Randy J. Boudrieau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Lewis. The network helps show where Daniel D. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel D. Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel D. Lewis Line = papers co-authored together Daniel D. Lewis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20240
4 20230
5 202112
6 201223
7
Vacuum-assisted wound closure: Clinical applications
20103
8 200973
9
Current treatment options for dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma
20050
10 200246
11 199932
12 199934
13 199822
14 199859
15 199426
16 19942
17
Femoral head and neck excision and the controversy concerning adjunctive soft tissue interposition
19924
18 199113
19 19907
20 199030

About Daniel D. Lewis

Daniel D. Lewis is a scholar working on Small Animals, Rehabilitation, Surgery, Equine and Epidemiology, having authored 172 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (94 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (81 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (70 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (34 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (26 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (23 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (11 papers) and Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (1.8k citations), Equine (154 citations), Rehabilitation (606 citations), Surgery (2.1k citations) and Epidemiology (1.3k citations). Daniel D. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Pozzi, Stanley E. Kim, Alan R. Cross, Bryan P. Conrad, Scott A. Banks, Robert D. Welch, Giselle Hosgood, Michael P. Kowaleski, MaryBeth Horodyski and Paul Kubilis. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Surgery, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology and Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026