Matthew Bryan

1.9k citations
50 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Bryan

48 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Matthew Bryan
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Condensed Matter Physics 312
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 454
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 716
  • Biological Psychiatry 33
  • Neurology 112
Replace Hyonchol Kim with:
Hyonchol Kim Japan
G. Romano Italy
Bumjin Kim South Korea
Matthew A. Thompson United States
Eugene Chen United States
Tianyu Wang China
Qin Wang China
Zhaohao Wang China
Takeshi Yagi Japan
Samarendra Kumar Mohanty United States
Matthew Bryan relative to Hyonchol Kim Japan Hyonchol Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Hyonchol Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Bryan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Bryan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Bryan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Bryan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Bryan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Bryan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Bryan. The network helps show where Matthew Bryan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Bryan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Bryan Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Bryan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005279
2 2005179
3 201499
4 201596
5 201394
6 200891
7 201558
8 201954
9 200453
10 201149
11 201549
12 200741
13 201038
14 201236
15 201536
16 201027
17 201127
18 200523
19 201021
20 201821

About Matthew Bryan

Matthew Bryan is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (28 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (16 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (8 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (8 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (7 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (6 papers) and ZnO doping and properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (312 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (454 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (716 citations), Biological Psychiatry (33 citations) and Neurology (112 citations). Matthew Bryan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include D. A. Allwood, Thomas Schrefl, Del Atkinson, Julian S. Dean, R. P. Cowburn, G. Hrkac, Keith T. Butler, Margaret M. Racke, Ronald Bradley Demattos and DANIEL K. NESS. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Physical Review B and Alzheimer s & Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact