Mathieu Perret

26 papers receiving 801 citations

Peers

Mathieu Perret
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 733
  • Plant Science 352
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 112
  • Molecular Biology 509
  • Forestry 23
Replace William J. D. Iles with:
William J. D. Iles United States
Steven B. Janssens Belgium
Mark G. Harrington Australia
M. Dolores Lledó United Kingdom
Dion S. Devey United Kingdom
Benjamin W. van Ee United States
Conny Bruun Asmussen Lange Denmark
Lars Nauheimer Australia
Mike Thiv Germany
Erik J. M. Koenen Switzerland
Mathieu Perret relative to William J. D. Iles United States William J. D. Iles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
William J. D. Iles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathieu Perret

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathieu Perret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathieu Perret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathieu Perret more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathieu Perret

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathieu Perret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathieu Perret. The network helps show where Mathieu Perret may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathieu Perret, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathieu Perret Line = papers co-authored together Mathieu Perret links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001129
2 2003122
3 2003109
4 201297
5 201786
6 200777
7 202150
8 200647
9 201825
10 201518
11 201311
12 201311
13 202010
14 20108
15 20197
16 20166
17 20225
18 20244
19 20224
20 20243

About Mathieu Perret

Mathieu Perret is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Food Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (24 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (22 papers), Plant and animal studies (19 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1 paper) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (733 citations), Plant Science (352 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (112 citations), Molecular Biology (509 citations) and Forestry (23 citations). Mathieu Perret has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alain Chautems, Rodolphe Spichiger, Nicolas Salamin, Vincent Savolainen, Andréa Onofre de Araújo, Michael Möller, Veronika Mayer, Anton Weber, Martha L. Serrano‐Serrano and Geoffrey C. Kite. Their work appears in journals such as Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, American Journal of Botany, Taxon, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact