Mathias Blanz

1.0k total citations
18 papers, 718 citations indexed

About

Mathias Blanz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Mathias Blanz has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 718 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Mathias Blanz's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Sociology and Education Studies (4 papers). Mathias Blanz is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Sociology and Education Studies (4 papers). Mathias Blanz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and United Kingdom. Mathias Blanz's co-authors include Amélie Mummendey, Rosemarie Mielke, Andreas Klink, Sabine Otten, Michael Wenzel, Luisa Molinari, Sandra Schruijer, Helga Dittmar, Anette Rohmann and Ursula Piontkowski and has published in prestigious journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, European Journal of Social Psychology and British Journal of Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Mathias Blanz

18 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mathias Blanz Germany 12 550 366 138 93 51 18 718
Naomi Struch Israel 6 586 1.1× 496 1.4× 84 0.6× 157 1.7× 38 0.7× 8 783
Jason A. Nier United States 10 416 0.8× 258 0.7× 130 0.9× 59 0.6× 42 0.8× 13 564
Brenda S. Banker United States 8 563 1.0× 349 1.0× 168 1.2× 55 0.6× 31 0.6× 9 752
Eva Louvet France 12 564 1.0× 299 0.8× 172 1.2× 140 1.5× 80 1.6× 34 869
Birte Siem Germany 12 554 1.0× 382 1.0× 106 0.8× 137 1.5× 42 0.8× 25 774
Carmen Huici Spain 14 661 1.2× 525 1.4× 72 0.5× 139 1.5× 55 1.1× 26 970
Mrc Hewstone 2 467 0.8× 316 0.9× 176 1.3× 72 0.8× 61 1.2× 2 666
Guy Foster Bachman United States 9 597 1.1× 521 1.4× 71 0.5× 63 0.7× 83 1.6× 11 876
Andreas Klink Germany 5 659 1.2× 361 1.0× 123 0.9× 62 0.7× 20 0.4× 6 783
Ingrid Zakrisson Sweden 8 570 1.0× 386 1.1× 130 0.9× 95 1.0× 51 1.0× 18 776

Countries citing papers authored by Mathias Blanz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathias Blanz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathias Blanz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathias Blanz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathias Blanz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathias Blanz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathias Blanz. The network helps show where Mathias Blanz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mathias Blanz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mathias Blanz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mathias Blanz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mathias Blanz. Mathias Blanz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Blanz, Mathias. (2021). Forschungsmethoden und Statistik für die Soziale Arbeit. 24 indexed citations
2.
Blanz, Mathias, et al.. (2020). Taking drugs for exams: an investigation with social work students. Social Work Education. 40(6). 737–755. 3 indexed citations
3.
Blanz, Mathias, et al.. (2018). Hidden discrimination in front of social work’s own door: the case of homosexual employees at Christian social services in Germany. European Journal of Social Work. 23(2). 239–252. 5 indexed citations
4.
Blanz, Mathias. (2017). Employees’ Job Satisfaction: A Test of the Job Characteristics Model Among Social Work Practitioners. PubMed. 14(1). 35–50. 30 indexed citations
5.
Blanz, Mathias. (2013). How do study satisfaction and academic performance interrelate? An investigation with students of Social Work programs. European Journal of Social Work. 17(2). 281–292. 18 indexed citations
6.
Blanz, Mathias, Ursula Piontkowski, Arnd Florack, & Anette Rohmann. (2001). When people belong to more than one group: A fit-based approach to multiple categorization. 2 indexed citations
7.
Blanz, Mathias, et al.. (1999). Social categorization and category attribution: The effects of comparative and normative fit on memory and social judgment. British Journal of Social Psychology. 38(2). 157–179. 17 indexed citations
8.
Blanz, Mathias. (1999). Accessibility and fit as determinants of the salience of social categorizations. European Journal of Social Psychology. 29(1). 43–74. 80 indexed citations
9.
Mummendey, Amélie, Andreas Klink, Rosemarie Mielke, Michael Wenzel, & Mathias Blanz. (1999). Socio-structural characteristics of intergroup relations and identity management strategies: results from a field study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology. 29(2-3). 259–285. 127 indexed citations
10.
Mummendey, Amélie, Andreas Klink, Rosemarie Mielke, Michael Wenzel, & Mathias Blanz. (1999). Socio‐structural characteristics of intergroup relations and identity management strategies: results from a field study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology. 29(23). 259–285. 6 indexed citations
11.
Blanz, Mathias, Amélie Mummendey, Rosemarie Mielke, & Andreas Klink. (1998). Wechselseitige Differenzierung zwischen sozialen Gruppen: Ein Vorhersagemodell der Theorie der sozialen Identität. 29(3). 239–259. 4 indexed citations
12.
Blanz, Mathias, Amélie Mummendey, Rosemarie Mielke, & Andreas Klink. (1998). Responding to negative social identity: a taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology. 28(5). 697–729. 186 indexed citations
13.
Blanz, Mathias, Amélie Mummendey, & Sabine Otten. (1997). Normative evaluations and frequency expectations regarding positive versus negative outcome allocations between groups. European Journal of Social Psychology. 27(2). 165–176. 36 indexed citations
14.
Mummendey, Amélie, et al.. (1996). Zum Zusammenhang von negativer sozialer Identität und Vergleichen zwischen Personen und Gruppen: Eine Felduntersuchung in Ost- und Westdeutschland.. 4 indexed citations
15.
Otten, Sabine, Amélie Mummendey, & Mathias Blanz. (1996). Intergroup Discrimination in Positive and Negative Outcome Allocations: Impact of Stimulus Valence, Relative Group Status, and Relative Group Size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 22(6). 568–581. 75 indexed citations
16.
Blanz, Mathias, Amélie Mummendey, & Sabine Otten. (1995). Positive–negative asymmetry in social discrimination: The impact of stimulus valence and size and status differentials on intergroup evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology. 34(4). 409–419. 55 indexed citations
17.
Blanz, Mathias, Amélie Mummendey, & Sabine Otten. (1995). Perceptions of relative group size and group status: Effects on intergroup discrimination in negative evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology. 25(2). 231–247. 29 indexed citations
18.
Schruijer, Sandra, et al.. (1994). The Group-Serving Bias in Evaluating and Explaining Harmful Behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology. 134(1). 47–53. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026