Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output
Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Perotti
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Perotti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Perotti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Perotti more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Perotti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Perotti. The network helps show where Roberto Perotti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roberto Perotti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roberto Perotti.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roberto Perotti based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roberto Perotti. Roberto Perotti is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Perotti, Roberto. (2012). Comment on "Government Spending and Private Activity". NBER Chapters. 56–61.3 indexed citations
5.
Durante, Ruben, et al.. (2011). Academic Dynasties: Decentralization and Familism in the Italian Academia. NBER Working Paper No. 17572.. National Bureau of Economic Research.18 indexed citations
Perotti, Roberto, et al.. (2009). Academic Dynasties: Nepotism and Productivity in the Italian Academic System. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
Perotti, Roberto & Alberto Alesina. (1996). Déficit presupuestarios e instituciones presupuestarias. Papeles de economía española. 255–271.
16.
Alesina, Alberto & Roberto Perotti. (1996). Fiscal Discipline and the Budget Process. American Economic Review. 86(2). 401–407.190 indexed citations
17.
Gavin, Michael, Ricardo Hausmann, Roberto Perotti, & Ernesto Talvi. (1996). Managing Fiscal Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Volatility, Procyclicality, and Limited Creditworthiness. Econstor (Econstor).8 indexed citations
18.
Perotti, Roberto. (1996). Fiscal Consolidation in Europe: Composition Matters. American Economic Review. 86(2). 105–110.98 indexed citations
19.
Alesina, Alberto & Roberto Perotti. (1994). The Politics of Growth: A Survey of the Recent Literature. The World Bank Economic Review. 8.6 indexed citations
20.
Perotti, Roberto. (1992). Income Distribution, Politics, and Growth. American Economic Review. 82(2). 311–316.84 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.