Massimo Camellin
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Epidemiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Samuel Arba‐MosqueraAntonio CalossiKenneth J. HofferGiacomo SaviniFrancesco CaronesPiero BarboniMichele CarbonelliJacopo Guidotti
- Topics
- Corneal surgery and disorders (14 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Cataract & Refractive SurgeryJournal of Refractive SurgeryIndian Journal of Ophthalmology
- Partner nations
- ItalySpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Massimo Camellin
13 papers receiving 359 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 397
- Ophthalmology 327
- Epidemiology 237
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 76
- Cognitive Neuroscience 5
Countries citing papers authored by Massimo Camellin
This map shows the geographic impact of Massimo Camellin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Massimo Camellin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massimo Camellin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Massimo Camellin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Massimo Camellin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Massimo Camellin. The network helps show where Massimo Camellin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Massimo Camellin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Massimo Camellin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Massimo Camellin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Massimo Camellin. Massimo Camellin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 62 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 89 | |
| 14 | 19 |
About Massimo Camellin
Massimo Camellin is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (14 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (327 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (397 citations) and Epidemiology (237 citations). Massimo Camellin has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Arba‐Mosquera, Antonio Calossi, Kenneth J. Hoffer, Giacomo Savini, Francesco Carones, Piero Barboni, Michele Carbonelli, Jacopo Guidotti, Luigi Capasso and Nicola Rosa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Journal of Refractive Surgery and Indian Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.