Marzia Massimi
About
In The Last Decade
Marzia Massimi
6 papers receiving 688 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Molecular Biology 507
- Genetics 303
- Cell Biology 148
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 118
- Cognitive Neuroscience 116
Countries citing papers authored by Marzia Massimi
This map shows the geographic impact of Marzia Massimi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marzia Massimi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marzia Massimi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marzia Massimi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marzia Massimi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marzia Massimi. The network helps show where Marzia Massimi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marzia Massimi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marzia Massimi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marzia Massimi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marzia Massimi. Marzia Massimi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 472 | |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | 108 | |
| 6 | 62 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.