Kaat Smets

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
21 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Kaat Smets is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kaat Smets has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 5 papers in Communication and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Kaat Smets's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (10 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). Kaat Smets is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (10 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). Kaat Smets collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Belgium. Kaat Smets's co-authors include Carolien van Ham, Anja Neundorf, Gema García-Albacete, Richard G. Niemi, Pierangelo Isernia, Patrick Santens, Jonathan Baets, Linda De Meırleır, Peter De Jonghe and Michael S. Lewis‐Beck and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Kaat Smets

18 papers receiving 982 citations

Hit Papers

The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individua... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kaat Smets United Kingdom 12 597 454 240 171 87 21 1.0k
Christopher Hewitt United States 14 271 0.5× 478 1.1× 49 0.2× 62 0.4× 61 0.7× 32 831
Andrew Reynolds United States 21 848 1.4× 700 1.5× 45 0.2× 598 3.5× 26 0.3× 52 1.5k
Daniel Maliniak United States 10 345 0.6× 300 0.7× 70 0.3× 267 1.6× 9 0.1× 22 908
Christopher S. Parker United States 16 270 0.5× 320 0.7× 49 0.2× 79 0.5× 33 0.4× 38 667
Meaghan Morris Australia 14 106 0.2× 453 1.0× 65 0.3× 87 0.5× 19 0.2× 54 947
Arlene Stein United States 16 94 0.2× 516 1.1× 30 0.1× 317 1.9× 52 0.6× 37 1.0k
Olivier Roy Italy 22 1.4k 2.4× 2.1k 4.7× 47 0.2× 70 0.4× 48 0.6× 166 2.8k
Esther Oliver Spain 12 43 0.1× 130 0.3× 22 0.1× 68 0.4× 79 0.9× 37 632
Annette Zimmer Germany 17 209 0.4× 464 1.0× 32 0.1× 30 0.2× 16 0.2× 73 1.0k
Anita L. Allen United States 14 173 0.3× 367 0.8× 33 0.1× 63 0.4× 140 1.6× 84 893

Countries citing papers authored by Kaat Smets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kaat Smets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kaat Smets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kaat Smets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kaat Smets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kaat Smets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kaat Smets. The network helps show where Kaat Smets may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kaat Smets

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kaat Smets. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kaat Smets based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kaat Smets. Kaat Smets is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smets, Kaat, et al.. (2020). GIANT BASAL CELL CARCINOMA ON THE FOREHEAD AND WHY WE SHOULD PREVENT THEM - CASE REPORT.. PubMed. 61(1-4). 24–27.
2.
Vaccari, Cristian, Kaat Smets, & Oliver Heath. (2019). The United Kingdom 2017 election: polarisation in a split issue space. West European Politics. 43(3). 587–609. 5 indexed citations
3.
Smets, Kaat, et al.. (2019). Culture eats strategy for breakfast. 1 indexed citations
4.
Neundorf, Anja, Richard G. Niemi, & Kaat Smets. (2016). The Compensation Effect of Civic Education on Political Engagement: How Civics Classes Make Up for Missing Parental Socialization. Political Behavior. 38(4). 921–949. 108 indexed citations
5.
Smets, Kaat. (2015). Revisiting the political life-cycle model: later maturation and turnout decline among young adults. European Political Science Review. 8(2). 225–249. 34 indexed citations
6.
Isernia, Pierangelo, Kaat Smets, & Marco R. Steenbergen. (2014). ARGUMENTS, BELIEFS AND UNCERTAINTY - A STUDY OF MICRO-MECHANISMS OF ATTITUDE CHANGE IN DELIBERATIVE SETTINGS.
7.
Smets, Kaat & Pierangelo Isernia. (2014). The role of deliberation in attitude change: An empirical assessment of three theoretical mechanisms. European Union Politics. 15(3). 389–409. 16 indexed citations
8.
Smets, Kaat, et al.. (2014). Meta-Analysis: Why Do Citizens Vote (or Abstain) in National Elections?. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 2 indexed citations
9.
Isernia, Pierangelo & Kaat Smets. (2013). Revealing preferences: Does deliberation increase ideological awareness among the less well educated?. European Journal of Political Research. 53(3). 520–540. 5 indexed citations
10.
Hooghe, Marc & Kaat Smets. (2013). Jongeren en politiek in verandering. Res Publica. 55(1). 5–9.
11.
Bekkering, Geertruida E, Bert Aertgeerts, Martine Goossens, et al.. (2013). Practitioner Review: Evidence‐based practice guidelines on alcohol and drug misuse among adolescents: a systematic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 55(1). 3–21. 16 indexed citations
12.
Smets, Kaat & Anja Neundorf. (2013). The hierarchies of age-period-cohort research: Political context and the development of generational turnout patterns. Electoral Studies. 33. 41–51. 56 indexed citations
13.
Smets, Kaat. (2013). De opkomstkloof tussen jongvolwassenen en ouderen in nationale verkiezingen. Res Publica. 55(1). 11–36. 1 indexed citations
14.
Neundorf, Anja, Kaat Smets, & Gema García-Albacete. (2012). Homemade citizens: The development of political interest during adolescence and young adulthood. Acta Politica. 48(1). 92–116. 126 indexed citations
15.
Smets, Kaat. (2012). A Widening Generational Divide? The Age Gap in Voter Turnout Through Time and Space. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 22(4). 407–430. 36 indexed citations
16.
Stegmaier, Mary, Michael S. Lewis‐Beck, & Kaat Smets. (2012). Standing for Parliament: Do Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Candidates Pay Extra?. Parliamentary Affairs. 66(2). 268–285. 17 indexed citations
17.
Baets, Jonathan, Tine Deconinck, Kaat Smets, et al.. (2010). Mutations in SACS cause atypical and late-onset forms of ARSACS. Neurology. 75(13). 1181–1188. 85 indexed citations
18.
Dermaut, Bart, Sara Seneca, Lina Dom, et al.. (2009). Progressive myoclonic epilepsy as an adult-onset manifestation of Leigh syndrome due to m.14487T>C. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 81(1). 90–93. 27 indexed citations
19.
Baets, Jonathan, P. Pals, Bruno Bergmans, et al.. (2006). Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome: a clinicopathological confrontation.. PubMed. 106(3). 142–6. 13 indexed citations
20.
Smets, Kaat, et al.. (2005). Central neurocytoma presenting with intraventricular hemorrhage: case report and review of literature.. PubMed. 105(4). 218–25. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026