Mary Shepherd

880 total citations
13 papers, 497 citations indexed

About

Mary Shepherd is a scholar working on Education, Modeling and Simulation and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Shepherd has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 497 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Education, 2 papers in Modeling and Simulation and 2 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Mary Shepherd's work include Mathematics Education and Programs (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). Mary Shepherd is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Programs (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). Mary Shepherd collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Mary Shepherd's co-authors include R. Guha, Dexter Pratt, Karen Pittman, Douglas B. Lenat, Annie Selden, John Selden, Mark Ashworth and Chris Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and The Journal of Mathematical Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Mary Shepherd

12 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers

Mary Shepherd

AI

EDUCA

IS

SP

DEP

Angeliki Lazaridou Italy

John Peterson United States

Ann Devitt Ireland

Helmut Horacek Germany

Felix Mödritscher Austria

Richard Power United Kingdom

Menno van Zaanen Netherlands

Terrill L. Frantz United States

Guillaume Durand Canada

Dina Goren‐Bar Israel

Angeliki Lazaridou Italy

Mary Shepherd

574 ×2.6

AI

105 ×1.3

EDUCA

35 ×0.5

IS

40 ×0.7

SP

20 ×0.4

DEP

Citations per year, relative to Mary Shepherd Mary Shepherd (= 1×) peers Angeliki Lazaridou

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Shepherd

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Shepherd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Shepherd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Shepherd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Shepherd

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Shepherd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Shepherd. The network helps show where Mary Shepherd may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Shepherd

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Shepherd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Shepherd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Shepherd. Mary Shepherd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Shepherd, Mary, et al.. (2014). Reading mathematics for understanding—From novice to expert. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 35. 74–86. 38 indexed citations

2.

Shepherd, Mary, Annie Selden, & John Selden. (2012). University Students' Reading of Their First-Year Mathematics Textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 14(3). 226–256. 42 indexed citations

3.

Shepherd, Mary, Annie Selden, & John Selden. (2011). Possible Reasons for Students' Ineffective Reading of Their First-Year University Mathematics Textbooks. Technical Report. No. 2011-2.. 1 indexed citations

4.

Shepherd, Mary, Annie Selden, & John Selden. (2009). Difficulties First-Year University Mathematics Students Have in Reading Their Mathematics Textbook. Technical Report. No. 2009-1.. 1 indexed citations

5.

Ashworth, Mark, et al.. (2007). What does an idiographic measure (PSYCHLOPS) tell us about the spectrum of psychological issues and scores on a nomothetic measure (CORE-OM)?. Research Portal (King's College London). 24 indexed citations

6.

Shepherd, Mary. (2005). ENCOURAGING STUDENTS TO READ MATHEMATICS. PRIMUS. 15(2). 124–144. 14 indexed citations

7.

Shepherd, Mary. (2000). Essays on the perception of an external universe. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 8 indexed citations

8.

Shepherd, Mary, et al.. (2000). Philosophical Works of Lady Mary Shepherd. 1 indexed citations

9.

Shepherd, Mary. (1999). Line congruences as surfaces in the space of lines. Differential Geometry and its Applications. 10(1). 1–26. 7 indexed citations

10.

Shepherd, Mary. (1994). Forrest's Curious Old Play: or, Hopkinson's Disappointment. The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America. 88(1). 37–52.

11.

Lenat, Douglas B., R. Guha, Karen Pittman, Dexter Pratt, & Mary Shepherd. (1990). Cyc: toward programs with common sense. Communications of the ACM. 33(8). 30–49. 263 indexed citations

12.

Shepherd, Mary. (1970). The psychology of superstition. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 14(1). 113–113. 78 indexed citations

13.

Shepherd, Mary. (1968). The June bug: A study of hysterical contagion. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 12(4). 307–307. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact