Mary Schmidt Read

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 687 citations indexed

About

Mary Schmidt Read is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Schmidt Read has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 687 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 8 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 7 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Mary Schmidt Read's work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (12 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (8 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers). Mary Schmidt Read is often cited by papers focused on Spinal Cord Injury Research (12 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (8 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers). Mary Schmidt Read collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Denmark. Mary Schmidt Read's co-authors include Rüdiger Rupp, Steven Kirshblum, Brittany Snider, Michael L. Boninger, John F. Ditunno, Stephen P. Burns, Fin Biering‐Sørensen, Gianna M. Rodriguez, Daniel Graves and Christian Schuld and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Neurotrauma and Spinal Cord.

In The Last Decade

Mary Schmidt Read

15 papers receiving 672 citations

Hit Papers

International Standards for Neurological Classification o... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Schmidt Read United States 8 474 226 209 179 71 16 687
Christian Schuld Germany 13 588 1.2× 219 1.0× 136 0.7× 340 1.9× 40 0.6× 43 843
Thomas E. Groomes United States 5 222 0.5× 259 1.1× 127 0.6× 147 0.8× 86 1.2× 6 607
Gabriel Zeilig Israel 11 263 0.6× 231 1.0× 281 1.3× 112 0.6× 74 1.0× 35 913
Barbara Morganti Italy 11 452 1.0× 222 1.0× 185 0.9× 180 1.0× 21 0.3× 12 592
Colleen F. McGillivray Canada 14 677 1.4× 248 1.1× 345 1.7× 133 0.7× 65 0.9× 18 1.0k
Yvonne Janssen‐Potten Netherlands 19 197 0.4× 322 1.4× 551 2.6× 127 0.7× 35 0.5× 39 847
Michael Haak United States 7 858 1.8× 234 1.0× 253 1.2× 509 2.8× 41 0.6× 12 1.2k
Virginia Graziani United States 12 707 1.5× 289 1.3× 374 1.8× 318 1.8× 28 0.4× 16 988
G J Snoek Netherlands 15 666 1.4× 467 2.1× 430 2.1× 352 2.0× 107 1.5× 24 1.3k
E M K Bergström United Kingdom 11 502 1.1× 235 1.0× 290 1.4× 197 1.1× 15 0.2× 14 771

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Schmidt Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Schmidt Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Schmidt Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Schmidt Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Schmidt Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Schmidt Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Schmidt Read. The network helps show where Mary Schmidt Read may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Schmidt Read

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Schmidt Read. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Schmidt Read based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Schmidt Read. Mary Schmidt Read is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Read, Mary Schmidt, et al.. (2025). Combining Therapeutic Strategies to Treat the Injured Spinal Cord: A Translational Perspective. Journal of Neurotrauma. 42(23-24). 2129–2148. 1 indexed citations
2.
Snider, Brittany, Steven Kirshblum, R. Rupp, et al.. (2025). International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Classification Questions and Cases. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 31(3). 77–88. 1 indexed citations
3.
Snider, Brittany, Steven Kirshblum, R. Rupp, et al.. (2024). International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Case Examples Reinforcing Concepts From the 2019 Revision. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 31(3). 1–14. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ponnada, Aditya, et al.. (2022). Exploring Opportunities to Improve Physical Activity in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury Using Context-Aware Messaging. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 6(CSCW2). 1–27. 3 indexed citations
5.
Kirshblum, Steven, Mary Schmidt Read, & Rüdiger Rupp. (2021). Classification challenges of the 2019 revised International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). Spinal Cord. 60(1). 11–17. 16 indexed citations
6.
Rupp, Rüdiger, Christian Schuld, Fin Biering‐Sørensen, et al.. (2021). A taxonomy for consistent handling of conditions not related to the spinal cord injury (SCI) in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI). Spinal Cord. 60(1). 18–29. 10 indexed citations
7.
Rupp, Rüdiger, Fin Biering‐Sørensen, Stephen P. Burns, et al.. (2021). International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 27(2). 1–22. 228 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Kirshblum, Steven, Brittany Snider, Rüdiger Rupp, & Mary Schmidt Read. (2020). Updates of the International Standards for Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 31(3). 319–330. 121 indexed citations
10.
Pomeranz, Jamie L., et al.. (2012). Life Care Planning Projections for Individuals With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Before and After Locomotor Training Intervention. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy. 36(3). 144–153. 5 indexed citations
11.
Oyster, M., et al.. (2011). Investigation of Factors Associated With Manual Wheelchair Mobility in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 92(3). 484–490. 38 indexed citations
12.
Marino, Ralph J., Giorgio Scivoletto, Federica Tamburella, et al.. (2009). Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury Version 2 (WISCI-II) with Repeatability of the 10-m Walk Time. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 89(1). 7–15. 38 indexed citations
13.
Jackson, Amie B., John F. Ditunno, Mary Schmidt Read, et al.. (2008). Outcome Measures for Gait and Ambulation in the Spinal Cord Injury Population. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 31(5). 487–499. 149 indexed citations
14.
Read, Mary Schmidt, Sue Ann Sisto, & John F. Ditunno. (2008). Standardized Ambulation Assessments Following Spinal Cord Injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 14(1). 39–60. 3 indexed citations
15.
Buxbaum, Laurel J., et al.. (2008). Assessment of spatial attention and neglect with a virtual wheelchair navigation task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 30(6). 650–660. 68 indexed citations
16.
Buxbaum, Laurel J., et al.. (2006). Assessment of Spatial Neglect with a Virtual Wheelchair Navigation Task. 395. 94–99. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026