Mary Peter Mack
About
In The Last Decade
Mary Peter Mack
6 papers receiving 90 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Sociology and Political Science 54
- Political Science and International Relations 53
- History 20
- Economics and Econometrics 18
- History and Philosophy of Science 14
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Peter Mack
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Peter Mack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Peter Mack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Peter Mack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Peter Mack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Peter Mack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Peter Mack. The network helps show where Mary Peter Mack may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Peter Mack
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Peter Mack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Peter Mack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Peter Mack. Mary Peter Mack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | A Bentham reader | 23 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.