Mary M. Goodwin

28 total papers · 1.8k total citations
24 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Mary M. Goodwin is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary M. Goodwin has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Health, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mary M. Goodwin's work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (6 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers). Mary M. Goodwin is often cited by papers focused on Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (6 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers). Mary M. Goodwin collaborates with scholars based in United States and Uganda. Mary M. Goodwin's co-authors include Linda E. Saltzman, Ruth Petersen, Alison M. Spitz, Jill Waalen, Christopher H. Johnson, Brenda Colley Gilbert, Julie A. Gazmararian, James S. Marks, Alessandra Guedes and Sarah Bott and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Maternal and Child Health Journal.

In The Last Decade

Mary M. Goodwin

24 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Mary M. Goodwin 999 591 559 363 271 24 1.4k
Ruth Petersen 1.1k 1.1× 584 1.0× 519 0.9× 520 1.4× 326 1.2× 27 1.6k
Claudia Moreno 763 0.8× 425 0.7× 582 1.0× 591 1.6× 316 1.2× 27 1.6k
Donna Ansara 784 0.8× 408 0.7× 414 0.7× 443 1.2× 277 1.0× 15 1.2k
Lisa Shannon 765 0.8× 460 0.8× 656 1.2× 331 0.9× 293 1.1× 52 1.3k
Sherry Lipsky 928 0.9× 588 1.0× 459 0.8× 490 1.3× 210 0.8× 32 1.3k
Lorna O’Doherty 1.1k 1.1× 627 1.1× 431 0.8× 432 1.2× 308 1.1× 34 1.3k
Holly Johnson 982 1.0× 488 0.8× 845 1.5× 338 0.9× 277 1.0× 49 1.4k
Jennifer McCleary‐Sills 588 0.6× 286 0.5× 436 0.8× 432 1.2× 285 1.1× 31 1.1k
Barbara Lent 558 0.6× 421 0.7× 244 0.4× 416 1.1× 213 0.8× 36 1.2k
Sarah Bott 740 0.7× 468 0.8× 453 0.8× 562 1.5× 302 1.1× 37 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary M. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary M. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary M. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary M. Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary M. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary M. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary M. Goodwin. The network helps show where Mary M. Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary M. Goodwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary M. Goodwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary M. Goodwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary M. Goodwin. Mary M. Goodwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026